Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-11-2010, 01:54 PM
Yukface Yukface is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qaedain [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, ad hominem is any argument that includes insults and belittling.

The distinction you draw does not exist.
Common misconceptions about ad hominem

Gratuitous verbal abuse or "name-calling" itself is not an argumentum ad hominem or a logical fallacy.[5][6][7][8][9] The fallacy only occurs if personal attacks are employed instead of an argument to devalue an argument by attacking the speaker, not personal insults in the middle of an otherwise sound argument or insults that stand alone. "X's argument is invalid because X's analogy is false, there are differences between a republic and a democracy. But then again, X is idiotically ignorant." is gratuitously abusive but is not a fallacy because X's argument is actually addressed directly in the opening statement. "X is idiotically ignorant" is not a fallacy of itself. It is an argument that X doesn't know the difference between a republic and a democracy.
This is not to be confused with a true fallacy, which would be "X is idiotically ignorant [of politics], so why should we listen to him now?"
"In reality, ad hominem is unrelated to sarcasm or personal abuse. Argumentum ad hominem is the logical fallacy of attempting to undermine a speaker's argument by attacking the speaker instead of addressing the argument. The mere presence of a personal attack does not indicate ad hominem: the attack must be used for the purpose of undermining the argument, or otherwise the logical fallacy isn't there. It is not a logical fallacy to attack someone; the fallacy comes from assuming that a personal attack is also necessarily an attack on that person's arguments."[5]
"You are just an ignorant twit." This is an insult and it is abusive, but it is not an argument. Because it is not an argument, it cannot be a fallacy. Of course, that doesn't mean that such personal insults are OK - just that when they appear alone, they aren't logical fallacies.[10]

do not pass go do not collect $200
  #2  
Old 06-11-2010, 02:03 PM
Yukface Yukface is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 0
Default

in actuality you will see that never once did I say something like...

Hey Mikenoobtastic, your a dumbass noob who doesnt know his ass from a hole in his head, and since you are only level 10 with 17 posts I dont really give a shit what you think about camping mobs.

I actually solicited his opinion on the argument, and insulted his lack of ability to do such.

Opposedly he immediately tried to degrade my posts value with the, you are sure to bring more douchebaggery like boneface, which is a PROTOTYPE Ad hominem.

spend less time reading forums and more time reading your 8th grade homework.
  #3  
Old 06-11-2010, 02:29 PM
mr.miketastic mr.miketastic is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yukface [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
in actuality you will see that never once did I say something like...

Hey Mikenoobtastic, your a dumbass noob who doesnt know his ass from a hole in his head, and since you are only level 10 with 17 posts I dont really give a shit what you think about camping mobs.

I actually solicited his opinion on the argument, and insulted his lack of ability to do such.

Opposedly he immediately tried to degrade my posts value with the, you are sure to bring more douchebaggery like boneface, which is a PROTOTYPE Ad hominem.

spend less time reading forums and more time reading your 8th grade homework.
Actually, your argument would have more validity were I trying to, like you, hide behind a shield of moral superiority.
  #4  
Old 06-11-2010, 07:18 PM
Falisaty Falisaty is offline
Sarnak

Falisaty's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yukface [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Common misconceptions about ad hominem

Gratuitous verbal abuse or "name-calling" itself is not an argumentum ad hominem or a logical fallacy.[5][6][7][8][9] The fallacy only occurs if personal attacks are employed instead of an argument to devalue an argument by attacking the speaker, not personal insults in the middle of an otherwise sound argument or insults that stand alone. "X's argument is invalid because X's analogy is false, there are differences between a republic and a democracy. But then again, X is idiotically ignorant." is gratuitously abusive but is not a fallacy because X's argument is actually addressed directly in the opening statement. "X is idiotically ignorant" is not a fallacy of itself. It is an argument that X doesn't know the difference between a republic and a democracy.
This is not to be confused with a true fallacy, which would be "X is idiotically ignorant [of politics], so why should we listen to him now?"
"In reality, ad hominem is unrelated to sarcasm or personal abuse. Argumentum ad hominem is the logical fallacy of attempting to undermine a speaker's argument by attacking the speaker instead of addressing the argument. The mere presence of a personal attack does not indicate ad hominem: the attack must be used for the purpose of undermining the argument, or otherwise the logical fallacy isn't there. It is not a logical fallacy to attack someone; the fallacy comes from assuming that a personal attack is also necessarily an attack on that person's arguments."[5]
"You are just an ignorant twit." This is an insult and it is abusive, but it is not an argument. Because it is not an argument, it cannot be a fallacy. Of course, that doesn't mean that such personal insults are OK - just that when they appear alone, they aren't logical fallacies.[10]

do not pass go do not collect $200
MY GOD I feel like im back in College... my brain hurts
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyyfeleech View Post
You sir are brilliant
Falisaty Shagswell mage of 10 winters
"O Lord, bless this thy hand grenade that, with it, thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy." Armaments 2:9
Quote:
Originally Posted by pharmakos View Post
my dick would look huge in her hand
  #5  
Old 06-11-2010, 10:05 PM
Stepy Stepy is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 25
Default

Yes it's true pickled took me down and seven seconds flat and only used 1% mana, he is truly the best i surrender all my titles to him. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #6  
Old 06-11-2010, 10:12 PM
eqdruid76 eqdruid76 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stepy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes it's true pickled took me down and seven seconds flat and only used 1% mana, he is truly the best i surrender all my titles to him. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
But you were level 3, and he was level 36......
  #7  
Old 06-11-2010, 10:13 PM
Stepy Stepy is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 25
Default

Thats beside the point, do not deminish his accomplishments. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.