New (old school) opinion

[Yukface]

I will agree there is an ad hom here, but it is not from me, I presented a valid argument with legitimate points surrounding the camping rules and how, in my impression they will affect the long term gaming quality of this so called "classic" server. To date, all I have gotten in retort, is

I am childish

I am threatening

and I am other such nonsense

Now those are classic signs of a fallacy or ad hom only when they are used in place of an argument. I have laid my argument clearly and concisely, and have yet to be retorted with anything other than sarcasm and or personal attacks. Feel free to add some valuable arguments. I'll be waiting.

[Ihealyou]

Where did anyone call you out on using an ad hominum?

Here's one though: You obviously can't read posts, therefore your original point is invalid.

[Yukface]

Originally Posted by Ihealyou [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Where did anyone call you out on using an ad hominum?

Here's one though: You obviously can't read posts, therefore your original point is invalid.

Where did i say someone called me out on using an ad hom, i just stated a fact about the ad homs in this thread,

Here is another one..You obviously can't read posts, therefore your original point is invalid.

[Ihealyou]

Originally Posted by Yukface [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I will agree there is an ad hom here, but it is not from me

To me, this sounds like you are defending yourself from accusations of using ad hominums. If I was wrong, I'm sowwy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To keep this post in the spirit of RnF I am obligated to say that your mom is an ad hominum.