New (old school) opinion

[Ihealyou]

Nothing is better than Yukface.
I am better than nothing.
Therefore, I am better than Yukface.

[pickled_heretic]

Originally Posted by Ihealyou [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nothing is better than Yukface.
I am better than nothing.
Therefore, I am better than Yukface.

equivocation

[Ihealyou]

Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

equivocation

Pickled kicks puppies, therefore my original conclusion remains true.

[pickled_heretic]

Originally Posted by Ihealyou [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pickled kicks puppies, therefore my original conclusion remains true.

ad hom

[Alawen Everywhere]

Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ad hom

The entire thread is. The original point that resolving camp disputes as individuals is a defining aspect of EQ remains undisputed.

[Ihealyou]

Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ad hom

You cannot prove that I am not better than Yukface, therefore I must be better than him.

[mr.miketastic]

Originally Posted by Ihealyou [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You cannot prove that I am not better than Yukface, therefore I must be better than him.

Point taken. The lack of negative proof, though, is not always a means of validation.

[mr.miketastic]

But I was going to say... He keeps making your point on every post [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ihealyou]

Originally Posted by mr.miketastic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Point taken. The lack of negative proof, though, is not always a means of validation.

Thats usually true, but I'm a special case.

[pickled_heretic]

Originally Posted by mr.miketastic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Point taken. The lack of negative proof, though, is not always a means of validation.

yes, for the sake of brevity philosophers and debaters call this 'hasty generalization'