Washington State legalizes Marijuana

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by fishingme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Then you're arguing with me for no real point. Personally, a blunt is cool and all but when it comes to actually wanting to get a great high I'd much rather build a gravity bong with my friends and kill a gram for each bowl.

You started it. You replied to my post, not the other way around. And I wasn't even arguing with you. I never said it wasn't a waste to smoke such a large joint. Don't start arguments if you have no point.

The argument I had started here was in showing how the 2 ounce (1 ounce?) limit is absurd. And I haven't seen anyone argue to the contrary.

Do you think the government has no right to restrict you from smoking pot, but has all the right in the world to restrict you from owning more than some arbitrary amount?

[fishingme]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You started it. You replied to my post, not the other way around. And I wasn't even arguing with you. I never said it wasn't a waste to smoke such a large joint. Don't start arguments if you have no point.

The argument I had started here was in showing how the 2 ounce (1 ounce?) limit is absurd. And I haven't seen anyone argue to the contrary.

Do you think the government has no right to restrict you from smoking pot, but has all the right in the world to restrict you from owning more than some arbitrary amount?

Actually, I replied to Thulack's post. You then replied to my post, then so forth I replied to you. Sorry, argument/debate, whichever is fine. Personally, I don't think anyone has the right to restrict what you do to your own body.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by fishingme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Actually, I replied to Thulack's post. You then replied to my post, then so forth I replied to you. Sorry, argument/debate, whichever is fine. Personally, I don't think anyone has the right to restrict what you do to your own body.

If you want to get technical, you replied to Thulack addressing something I had said, so it's as good as a reply to my post.

And it appears you agree with me in regards to our relationship with government on this issue. The difference we have is that you would perpetrate violence upon those who smoke overly large joints. I'm not even sure I can call it wasting weed, since it certainly did bring us a certain amount of stoner amusement to see such a large joint rolled and smoked.

[fishingme]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you want to get technical, you replied to Thulack addressing something I had said, so it's as good as a reply to my post.

And it appears you agree with me in regards to our relationship with government on this issue. The difference we have is that you would perpetrate violence upon those who smoke overly large joints. I'm not even sure I can call it wasting weed, since it certainly did bring us a certain amount of stoner amusement to see such a large joint rolled and smoked.

My agreement is with you about what you do with your own body is generalized. Not just for weed use. I didn't perpetrate to violence. I said that "it makes me want to" Not that I would hit them. There's a clear line between that, have you not ever made a statement of disagreement while taking it to a certain level that you know you wouldn't actually do? Also, with lack of details that you had given in your initial post and then clarified in another that it was schwag then yes, it wasn't a waste.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by fishingme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, with lack of details that you had given in your initial post and then clarified in another that it was schwag then yes, it wasn't a waste.

Even if it was the finest $1000/oz bud, how is it your decision whether it's a waste or not? Perhaps I receive more than $1000 worth of enjoyment from rolling and smoking a giant joint. If that's the case, then it is a net positive.