Guilds

[Kika Maslyaka]

obviously a troll post, but why should they?
really? As long as they act within the rules, they can get as much as they can, as long as they first.
So, your question is moot.

[McMuffins]

Originally Posted by Kika Maslyaka [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

obviously a troll post, but why should they?
really? As long as they act within the rules, they can get as much as they can, as long as they first.
So, your question is moot.

Moot:

Adjective Subject to debate, dispute, or uncertainty, and typically not admitting of a final decision.

[Kika Maslyaka]

Originally Posted by McMuffins [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Moot:

Adjective Subject to debate, dispute, or uncertainty, and typically not admitting of a final decision.

as well as:

of little or no practical value or meaning; purely academic

[McMuffins]

Originally Posted by Kika Maslyaka [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as well as:

of little or no practical value or meaning; purely academic

Damn it.

Okay. So why should they... I'm watching the presidential election thing because I was forced to, and I guess I feel the same on both subjects: whatever.

They can share in order to provide more fun for everyone, or they can dominate and require more people to join them to see anything.

But who benefits from a big guild? The biggest members do the most. That's fine, they get the most loot I guess.

Still seems like it could be a friendlier middle ground.

I expect my post to cause 0 shits to be had, just curious myself I don't even play on blue.