Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-10-2012, 02:36 PM
Tarathiel Tarathiel is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: northern cali
Posts: 640
Default

personally acid was always easy to control, not like shrooming where one minute everything is sunshine and rainbows and the next minute satan himself is talking to you in your bathroom mirror
  #2  
Old 10-10-2012, 04:24 PM
Rkahor Rkahor is offline
Kobold

Rkahor's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarathiel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
personally acid was always easy to control, not like shrooming where one minute everything is sunshine and rainbows and the next minute satan himself is talking to you in your bathroom mirror
This is basically my experience as well. I've done both tons of times. Acid's always felt cleaner and way more controllable. But honestly there's tons of "fake"/substitute drugs on the market these days, DOI and DOB are the main culprit for fake acid and are both amphetamine's. But you can put whatever you want on a blotter sheet and say its LSD. I always test all my shit that I get cause I'm not trying to take bath salts or any other "experimental"/new chemical that makes you fucked up.

The officers definitely used excessive force if you taze someone 14 times when they are already in handcuffs. There's no way they couldn't have realized there's definitely something wrong with this kid and hes not acting like a normal person would. They should be trained to see when someone is off their rocker and obviously doesn't even realize what they are doing. I can tell just by looking into someones eyes and their body language if they are fucked up on acid/molly/coke/prescriptions pills or whatever drug of choice for the night.

The kid shares the blame though, he knew he was taking drugs and whatever comes after is his responsibility. If you can't handle your shit or took the time and research to know what may happen it's no one elses fault but your own. Unless I trust my source or have my test kit on me I'm not gonna buy random drugs from a festival hopping hippy that swears his shit is the fucking bomb. People are in the drug business to make money, and if you can make or obtain "fake" drugs way cheaper and give you similar effects, you know they are going to. The whole situation is fucked up in general.
__________________
  #3  
Old 10-10-2012, 04:28 PM
Orruar Orruar is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rkahor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is basically my experience as well. I've done both tons of times. Acid's always felt cleaner and way more controllable. But honestly there's tons of "fake"/substitute drugs on the market these days, DOI and DOB are the main culprit for fake acid and are both amphetamine's. But you can put whatever you want on a blotter sheet and say its LSD. I always test all my shit that I get cause I'm not trying to take bath salts or any other "experimental"/new chemical that makes you fucked up.
Good point. One more benefit of drug legalization is better quality. Prohibition makes it more likely that you take a substance that you're not prepared for. When you buy a can of coke, you can be sure it's not going to be filled with coffee, orange juice, or scat.
  #4  
Old 10-10-2012, 04:35 PM
Orruar Orruar is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,563
Default

I think one mistake that nearly everyone makes is the idea that laws are the only means of controlling human action. We're conditioned so that when we identify a problem with the human condition, such as drug addiction, we immediately look to government to solve it. It's good to want to solve problems, but government is no panacea cure for all troubles. Laws have much less influence on the actions of people than we would like to think. People form their own opinions of right and wrong and act accordingly. The only thing the law brings to the table is adding the threat of violence into the equation. Everything that follows is simply fruit of the poisonous tree (the Biblical definition, not the common law evidentiary meaning).
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.