Hookrs <TMO>

[Harazzer]

Yea, his tag is TMO. In order to get anything past their team of forum troll lawyers you need 17 different camera angles of proof as well as supporting expert testimony and even then the troll team will attempt a spin move!

[AimAce]

Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yea, his tag is TMO. In order to get anything past their team of forum troll lawyers you need 17 different camera angles of proof as well as supporting expert testimony and even then the troll team will attempt a spin move!

You know TMO is a bunch of nice people. Honestly. I don't understand all this hate on TMO. Now, admittedly, there ARE trolls (Seriously wtf Nietche) but on the whole TMO is fine.

That being said, the TMO trolls are certainly not helping in terms of PR on RnF. But who cares about RnF, just more trolls who probably play forum quest, and not actual EQ.

Long story short; TMO - okay, Trolls - not okay.

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yea, his tag is TMO. In order to get anything past their team of forum troll lawyers you need 17 different camera angles of proof as well as supporting expert testimony and even then the troll team will attempt a spin move!

No, people want to investigate more primarily because this was started in RnF. Because the guild leaders/GMs were not the first option, or at least concurrent with this post, that raises an issue.

That screenshot has a high possibility of being bluntly damning to Hookrs. No one disputes the possibility. However, if we are going to draw final judgements, a higher standard would be wise. There are reasonable alternative scenarios that have been suggested.

I suggest to the OP that you contact the GM staff first and a TMO officer second. The GMs can give you an ultimate and fair resolution via the logs. Unless, of course, you'd prefer the court of public opinion.