Rules clarification

[Cochonou]

Originally Posted by Shiftin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, they're definitely not the guild that pioneered:

Laying FD under trak and popping up to claim FTE AND running in folks DA idols when they didn't have the people to kill it, forcing IB to run out of the lair or finish our kill and hand them the loot (multiple times).

Running in and spamming aggro spells / clickies to pull aggro on trak to give him life back through lifetaps (multiple times).

AEing CCd trains when VS was being pulled to zone to break the CC and cause a massive wipe of both IB and half of KC.

No wait, all of those things were TMO, and almost all were Zeelot personally, before anyone from any other guild sunk to that level of utter nonsense rules lawyering.

Am afraid this post gets lost, so bumping it ! Shiftin is right here. All those facts are true, and I dare any TMO to claim those to be false.

That's the way TMO was "competing" with TR back in the day. Playing FTE rule no matter what. No raid force ? Doesn't matter ! just be the first one on aggro list and have another guild to kill the mob for you.

Alarti, Stealin, Tiggle, you can spin the machine as much as you want ! What TMO did yesterday is a dickmove. Yes, it is allowed by the raid rules, but what part of that don't you understand ?

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Raid Rules

These rules are created to encourage fair play and competition between raiding guilds. Be courteous and respectful of the other raiding guilds. The following rules apply in raid situations, and are enforced during any dispute.
The rules of engagement for raid bosses on Project 1999 are First to Engage (FTE) in any situation that is not covered below.

You didn't break any rule and you won't be suspended. Grats on that ! However, great way to show how you want to compete for your mobs ! You guys sure are an example to follow ! Keep acting this way guys ! You sure are working for a better health of the server.

[Lazortag]

When you invoke first-to-15, you preclude other guilds from competing with you. When you camp a large force near a raid mob but not directly on top of its spawn, other guilds can still "compete", it's just that it collapses into who gets FTE. Not taking any sides, just noting a distinction that should be obvious yet has never been mentioned in the last 11 pages.

[touchtonedialing]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When you invoke first-to-15, you preclude other guilds from competing with you.

Thats a very good point. TMO knew they wouldn't win so they didnt want to compete.



TMO!

"We want competition. Unless we arnt going to win, then we dont."

[Harazzer]

They need more trak bps to sell and more trak teeth for the feeder guild duh!

For real though, is standard procedure just to shit up a thread so it immediately goes to RNF, then continue to shit on it until everyone stops reading? When did server boards become somethingawful?

[Metallikus]

Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They need more trak bps to sell and more trak teeth for the feeder guild duh!

For real though, is standard procedure just to shit up a thread so it immediately goes to RNF, then continue to shit on it until everyone stops reading? When did server boards become somethingawful?

TMO has prided itself with a team of RNF trolls that shit up every thread in server chat that has anything derogatory about their guild in it.

[Relapse1]

sounds like you guys are still fighting over the same shitty content ..congrats

STILL GEttING THEM PIXELS OVER HERE

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Lazortag]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus

Instead of 15 manning, the new standard is jugg killing with a raid. It seems obvious to me that both "standards" lead to different forms of escalation. It just so happens that 15 manning the spawn is the established method, and more easily adjudicated. That said, 15 maning only happens very very late in a window, or in response to another guild's being present in force.

Normally this wouldn't be any of my business, but what if another guild wanted to compete over Trak? Why is it fair that your punishment for BDA's behaviour indirectly punishes other guilds? The way I see it as a third party, what BDA did didn't preclude us from competing, but claiming first-to-15 did. I'm not saying we were planning to contest Trak that night, but it discourages us and other casual guilds from doing so in the future when this kind of behaviour is the norm.

[Supaskillz]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Normally this wouldn't be any of my business, but what if another guild wanted to compete over Trak? Why is it fair that your punishment for BDA's behaviour indirectly punishes other guilds? The way I see it as a third party, what BDA did didn't preclude us from competing, but claiming first-to-15 did. I'm not saying we were planning to contest Trak that night, but it discourages us and other casual guilds from doing so in the future when this kind of behaviour is the norm.

What did BDA do that deserved to be punished? Is killing juggs/reets and hoping to get lucky on a trak spawn bad behavior now? We don't ask everyone to camp out their main and be sitting at the login screen ready to be on within 1 minute, so when we have alot of people on we kill juggs and reets get spells and a few items and hope trak spawns. We have employed the same strategy on numerous occasions in the past and only once did we get a trak spawn while doing it.

Divinity tried the same strat Monday night but had no luck on trak spawn.

Tmo used to the rules to claim the spawn, I am not that upset about that. It sure beats Darthdeath training us. I would take a lawyer over a criminal everytime. It was even suggested during our jugg run that we should sit on the spawn but we deemed the costs outweighed the benefits b/c it makes the encounter much harder and this rule had not been used in quite some time which we thought would lead to a sort of arm's race scenario. Its been used again so I expect it will be used often now anytime a mob goes late in window.

I will say that I agree with the OP that if you are going to use the rule to have the gms award you the "camp" then you should be required to maintain your camp. Moving the 15 away the second the other guild moves along is pretty lame and for anything else would be considering leaving your camp. The discouragement for using this rule is that it requires a great deal of dedication and effort to get the mob as well as a more difficult encounter.

[Lazortag]

Originally Posted by Supaskillz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What did BDA do that deserved to be punished? Is killing juggs/reets and hoping to get lucky on a trak spawn bad behavior now? We don't ask everyone to camp out their main and be sitting at the login screen ready to be on within 1 minute, so when we have alot of people on we kill juggs and reets get spells and a few items and hope trak spawns. We have employed the same strategy on numerous occasions in the past and only once did we get a trak spawn while doing it.

Divinity tried the same strat Monday night but had no luck on trak spawn.

Tmo used to the rules to claim the spawn, I am not that upset about that. It sure beats Darthdeath training us. I would take a lawyer over a criminal everytime. It was even suggested during our jugg run that we should sit on the spawn but we deemed the costs outweighed the benefits b/c it makes the encounter much harder and this rule had not been used in quite some time which we thought would lead to a sort of arm's race scenario. Its been used again so I expect it will be used often now anytime a mob goes late in window.

I will say that I agree with the OP that if you are going to use the rule to have the gms award you the "camp" then you should be required to maintain your camp. Moving the 15 away the second the other guild moves along is pretty lame and for anything else would be considering leaving your camp. The discouragement for using this rule is that it requires a great deal of dedication and effort to get the mob as well as a more difficult encounter.

I didn't say your behaviour should be punished or that it was bad in any way, and I have no opinion on whether it is. My point was that if TMO was going to use first-to-15 as punishment against BDA, it's unfair that other guilds get punished as well.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Supaskillz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What did BDA do that deserved to be punished? Is killing juggs/reets and hoping to get lucky on a trak spawn bad behavior now? We don't ask everyone to camp out their main and be sitting at the login screen ready to be on within 1 minute, so when we have alot of people on we kill juggs and reets get spells and a few items and hope trak spawns. We have employed the same strategy on numerous occasions in the past and only once did we get a trak spawn while doing it.

Divinity tried the same strat Monday night but had no luck on trak spawn.

Tmo used to the rules to claim the spawn, I am not that upset about that. It sure beats Darthdeath training us. I would take a lawyer over a criminal everytime. It was even suggested during our jugg run that we should sit on the spawn but we deemed the costs outweighed the benefits b/c it makes the encounter much harder and this rule had not been used in quite some time which we thought would lead to a sort of arm's race scenario. Its been used again so I expect it will be used often now anytime a mob goes late in window.

I will say that I agree with the OP that if you are going to use the rule to have the gms award you the "camp" then you should be required to maintain your camp. Moving the 15 away the second the other guild moves along is pretty lame and for anything else would be considering leaving your camp. The discouragement for using this rule is that it requires a great deal of dedication and effort to get the mob as well as a more difficult encounter.

If a guild invokes it, there has to be a guild to challenge it. If you see a guild claiming 15 with 15 and you want them to stay with 15, you should be required to keep people there as well.

One guild calls 15 with 15, fine, make them engage with 15 if it spawns. However, the other guild that wants them to engage with 15 should be required to enforce the challenge, not walk away and do whatever. It should discourage both sides from poopsocking and leading to the 15 on spawn.

FYI, Poopsocking generally leads to 15 on spawn or FTE GM calls. One route doesn't involve GMs the other does. TMO chose the correct route. The only other option TMO had was to give them Trakanon which is what BDA wanted. So cry more at not getting what you want, I see what your guild is truly upset about, not getting what they want (pixels).