Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

View Poll Results: Would EQ be better off without GMs?
Yes 21 37.50%
No 35 62.50%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-22-2012, 10:05 AM
Corrodith Corrodith is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 64
Default

I think VP (when there were 2 guilds that could compete there) was an excellent case in point for how lack of GM involvement leads to player agreements. There were no holds barred. If you wanted to hold your own there you had to have an organized raid force capable of dodging another guild's trains and staying alive. There were times where it was chaotic at the beginning, but then the establishment of stalemate as it proved too difficult for either IB or TMO to kill dragons in the presence of each other's trains. Clearly, eventually dragons would have died, but it would have proved to be far more inconvenience than it was worth, so a rotation was worked out that lasted many months.

Later on, another guild tried to enter VP. In a trial by fire it was determined that their raid force did not have the organization to survive in VP long enough to attempt a dragon. Thus, no rotation.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.