Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-24-2012, 06:05 AM
somnia somnia is offline
Kobold

somnia's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Clouds
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wudan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
monk will never have the tanking ability of SK. While its all good when fighting regular mobs, it is a different story when pulling high lvl named. SK is better for end game duo with shammy.

tanking ability > dps
If it can be slowed then it can probably be killed solo by the shaman. A monk just helps you get there faster.

If it can't be slowed than an SK won't do much good with a shaman healer.
  #2  
Old 04-24-2012, 08:00 AM
Wudan Wudan is offline
Sarnak

Wudan's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by somnia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If it can be slowed then it can probably be killed solo by the shaman. A monk just helps you get there faster.

If it can't be slowed than an SK won't do much good with a shaman healer.
This is simply not true. Slow is nice and helps a lot, but its not everything, especialy when engaging named mobs. Thinking shaman can solo stuff he can slow is just silly. In most cases, shamans cant take damage from high end named dungeon mobs. Also, shaman is not cleric... HoT is cool, but on long named fights shaman will be in pain healing monk.

These guys want to take on named mobs in dungeons, SK is the best option, end of story. More hp, better aggro management, much better tanking abilities.

It does not matter his dmg is lower then monks, what matters is whether he can TANK the mob long enough to kill it. He can certainly do that better then monk.
  #3  
Old 04-24-2012, 08:03 AM
Speedling Speedling is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wudan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is simply not true. Slow is nice and helps a lot, but its not everything, especialy when engaging named mobs. Thinking shaman can solo stuff he can slow is just silly. In most cases, shamans cant take damage from high end named dungeon mobs. Also, shaman is not cleric... HoT is cool, but on long named fights shaman will be in pain healing monk.

These guys want to take on named mobs in dungeons, SK is the best option, end of story. More hp, better aggro management, much better tanking abilities.

It does not matter his dmg is lower then monks, what matters is whether he can TANK the mob long enough to kill it. He can certainly do that better then monk.
List a name that a sk can tank and a shm can't imo. Shm > sks np.
  #4  
Old 04-24-2012, 09:36 AM
Wudan Wudan is offline
Sarnak

Wudan's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedling [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
List a name that a sk can tank and a shm can't imo. Shm > sks np.
reading comprehension ftw
  #5  
Old 04-24-2012, 03:42 PM
mwatt mwatt is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 569
Default

Although there is a rediculous amount of overlap, an Enchanter might be considered the most useful dungeon companion for a Shaman. The thing that is most missing from a Chanter is some way to heal, which the Shaman provides. With the Chanter you get:

* The best possible CC
* Charmed mob for tanking/dps
* Clarity or C2 (anybody who thinks Canni obviates C2 is wrong)
__________________
~ give me a large old school fantasy MMORPG, make it PVE, and hold the voice chat ~
  #6  
Old 04-24-2012, 03:47 PM
tristantio tristantio is offline
Fire Giant

tristantio's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 888
Default

Necro also can feed shaman mana while enjoying the chloroplast [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Realtime auction logger: http://ahungry.com/eqauctions/
  #7  
Old 04-25-2012, 05:34 AM
Kevlar Kevlar is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mwatt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Although there is a rediculous amount of overlap, an Enchanter might be considered the most useful dungeon companion for a Shaman. The thing that is most missing from a Chanter is some way to heal, which the Shaman provides. With the Chanter you get:

* The best possible CC
* Charmed mob for tanking/dps
* Clarity or C2 (anybody who thinks Canni obviates C2 is wrong)
But then you might as well go druid for the added utility and ensnare. Too much overlap with shm and ench. They are both good classes, just not as good together since they do a lot of the same things.
  #8  
Old 04-25-2012, 07:04 AM
fischsemmel fischsemmel is offline
Fire Giant

fischsemmel's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 681
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevlar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
But then you might as well go druid for the added utility and ensnare. Too much overlap with shm and ench. They are both good classes, just not as good together since they do a lot of the same things.
You be wrong.

The only overlap between the classes are root (oh noes, two classes that can root instead of just one), slow (and shaman slow is way, way better), and haste (and enchanter haste is way, way better).

Enchanter is on pet duty, CC, c2, tash.
Shaman is on pet buff+heal duty, slow, maybe a bit of help rooting, malo on pets and mobs alike, and contributes extra dps with his pet and maybe some dots/clickies.

Super strong combo, yo. I would think it is as strong as a cleric+enchanter, just that you have a stronger pet and a better slow instead of hp buffs, ranged stuns, and CH.
__________________
[59 Troubadour] Fischsemmel (Human)
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.