Rotation on Raid Targets ?

[Dabamf]

Originally Posted by TheDudeAbides [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You mean like people remembering shit from 4 years previous and posting about it on message boards? That's "absurdly unreliable"? .

Yes, it is. Unless you wanna dispute peer-reviewed science.

When a bunch of people come together with the same memory, like those saying you could bind in fear, it is more reliable. But a lone Siinge-esque retard arguing against 8 people and 15 posts from 2000, using only memory as evidence, is the definition of unreliable.

You've gone off the deepend. Didn't you quit like over a month ago? Why do you still care what happens? It's pretty pathetic

[TheDudeAbides]

Originally Posted by Dabamf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, it is. Unless you wanna dispute peer-reviewed science.

When a bunch of people come together with the same memory, like those saying you could bind in fear, it is more reliable. But a lone Siinge-esque retard arguing against 8 people and 15 posts from 2000, using only memory as evidence, is the definition of unreliable.

So remembering content from 10 years ago is now "peer reviewed" science?

Other people agree with me bro. I'm not alone in this recollection. I'll dig up the patch notes. If I'm wrong about the bind, then I'm wrong about it. That doesn't mean I'm backing away shit. You're hilarious. It still doesn't change the fact nobody actually bound there to gate and go sit and track AFK back in the day. There was no "safe spot" to sit and track shit.

Maestro couldn't be duo'd with a cleric and enchanter

Couldn't bind in hate. Couldn't track Inny from ZL (AFAIR). There are lot of mechanics that could be changed here to make the end game a lot more appealing than it currently stands now and you know this. The sit and track without any danger in the planes to summon people" raiding scene here doesn't reflect classic. There needs to be a danger to the planes that is severely lacking atm.

[Dabamf]

Originally Posted by TheDudeAbides [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So remembering content from 10 years ago is now "peer reviewed" science?
.

What? WHAT? You're trolling, aren't you? Please tell me you're trolling.