Trakanon Rotation

[Alkorin]

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What gave VD the right to demand a rotation on dragons they haven't even attempted, much less killed? I don't doubt your abilities, but the means you are using to go about securing a rotation are dubious and unjustified.

They say above that they can kill every dragon in VP if uncontested. Why not give them the chance?

Let them put their money where their mouths are. If they fail to clear VP within some time frame, they should agree to leave you all alone while you do so, until they are capable of competing.

[Metallikus]

Originally Posted by Alkorin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They say above that they can kill every dragon in VP if uncontested. Why not give them the chance?

Let them put their money where their mouths are. If they fail to clear VP within some time frame, they should agree to leave you all alone while you do so, until they are capable of competing.

TMO / IB did not compete for their first VP dragon kills. GM intervention gave them 3 dragons each on release. They fought for a min after that, but then decided to rotate instead. What gives TMO the right to deny VD a chance at the same pie? Instead they chose to compete by raid interfering while on suspension, so VD returns the favor by competing with raid interference now. All of a sudden they can't kill mobs in VP, so raid interference shouldn't be allowed.

[Alkorin]

Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TMO / IB did not compete for their first VP dragon kills. GM intervention gave them 3 dragons each on release. They fought for a min after that, but then decided to rotate instead. What gives TMO the right to deny VD a chance at the same pie? Instead they chose to compete by raid interfering while on suspension, so VD returns the favor by competing with raid interference now. All of a sudden they can't kill mobs in VP, so raid interference shouldn't be allowed.

Can you read?

I'm suggesting that TMO give VD a chance to fully clear VP within a certain time frame. If you guys can't do the job without interference, what right do you have to even be in there ruining it for others?

Be reasonable?

[Metallikus]

Originally Posted by Alkorin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can you read?

I'm suggseting that TMO give VD a chance to fully clear VP within a certain time frame. If you guys can't do the job without interference, what right do you have to even be in there ruining it for others?

Be reasonable?

VD has no problem with this. Set it up.

[Frieza_Prexus]

Most recently they sent an untagged alt named Painfull to eye pull guardian wurms on a group of VD outside of VP in skyfire.

That was him acting on his own. He's paid for that. It was wrong on every level, and a number of us told him not to do it. Myself included.

They think they can get away with that BS because they have a GM in place that will not respond to petitions and deletes them months later. Thats why IB left the server.

Why don't we lay off both guides? yes, the GM staff has obviously made mistakes, but overall I find them fair and mostly evenhanded when I consider the facts at their disposal from their point of view. Amelinda used her judgement in response to our submitted brief regarding our suspension. The same way the Ambrotos effectively said in the bug forum that it's not really his call to create a new rule regarding the blurring unless he's given new marching orders.

Yeah, they're going to screw up and should be accountable, but let's tone down the hyperbole leveled at them. I assure you, neither guild has sat down and thought "I'll just get the GM to rule for me even though I know I'm acting in the wrong."