/guildwar

[fischsemmel]

What I find interesting is that there was even a need for red in the first place.

I know that turning on PvP isn't quite the same as what they have on red right now. But what are the differences between 1) having blue and red and 2) having blue with all the players who are currently on red just enabling pvp?

The difference is the red players wouldn't be able to get at any high-end PvE gear by PvPing their competition.

But wait. I thought leet PvPers on red didn't give a shit about PvE.

Huh.

[Darwoth]

Originally Posted by fischsemmel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What I find interesting is that there was even a need for red in the first place.

I know that turning on PvP isn't quite the same as what they have on red right now. But what are the differences between 1) having blue and red and 2) having blue with all the players who are currently on red just enabling pvp?

The difference is the red players wouldn't be able to get at any high-end PvE gear by PvPing their competition.

But wait. I thought leet PvPers on red didn't give a shit about PvE.

Huh.

no the difference is that the entire reason we play on red is to not have to play alongside several hundred annoying retards like yourself that we can;t kill, and since people like you would not have the pvp flag enabled it defeats the entire point.

and yes, guildwar with specifiy from 1 day to two weeks was a classic function.

[Lazortag]

Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no the difference is that the entire reason we play on red is to not have to play alongside several hundred annoying retards like yourself that we can;t kill, and since people like you would not have the pvp flag enabled it defeats the entire point.

and yes, guildwar with specifiy from 1 day to two weeks was a classic function.

What? If all the red players migrated to blue and turned in their books there'd be the same number of pvp-flagged players. Your argument makes no sense. The reason red99 is needed is because you can resolve camp disputes and stuff like that with pvp.

[Darwoth]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What? If all the red players migrated to blue and turned in their books there'd be the same number of pvp-flagged players. Your argument makes no sense. The reason red99 is needed is because you can resolve camp disputes and stuff like that with pvp.

comprehension, get some

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

comprehension, get some

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by fischsemmel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What I find interesting is that there was even a need for red in the first place.

I know that turning on PvP isn't quite the same as what they have on red right now. But what are the differences between 1) having blue and red and 2) having blue with all the players who are currently on red just enabling pvp?

The difference is the red players wouldn't be able to get at any high-end PvE gear by PvPing their competition.

But wait. I thought leet PvPers on red didn't give a shit about PvE.

Huh.

Because some of us don't want to log in, see all of our camps taken by poopsockers, and log out having nothing to do. We prefer to be able to kill said poopsockers and take their precious camps, thanks.