To be a Wizard Means This

[socialist]

Originally Posted by fiegi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your argument is that harvest gives less mana over time then another non-classic spell(breeze) - brilliant.

There is no debate here. Having harvest is a huge advantage in classic everquest

The argument, obviously, is that the spell is less effective than a level 16 mana regen buff.

Huge advantage? Nah. The only thing there's no debate about is whether or not it should be removed, because it should. I just find it hilarious how people point to harvest as their excuse for losing.

[Lovely]

If it wasn't for harvest I'd be stuck at level 10 with Holocaust griefing me

But in all honestly if I played a Mage, Necro, Druid or Bard I'd be 50 long ago my friends.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Lovely [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If it wasn't for harvest I'd be stuck at level 10 with Holocaust griefing me

But in all honestly if I played a Mage, Necro, Druid or Bard I'd be 50 long ago my friends.

And if the wands had been addressed before launch you'd be lvl 40 instead of 45.

[fiegi]

Originally Posted by socialist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The argument, obviously, is that the spell is less effective than a level 16 mana regen buff.

Huge advantage? Nah. The only thing there's no debate about is whether or not it should be removed, because it should. I just find it hilarious how people point to harvest as their excuse for losing.

We can sit here and weigh how much harvest helps - however ultimately it comes down to playtime and how efficient you were with that playtime. I agree with you tho anyone using it as an excuse for losing either in pvp or that mindless idea of racing to 50 is just a pathetic schmuck.