OCCUPY WALLSTREET!

[Samoht]

well maybe if your kind didn't insist on preaching the "abstinence only" policy, there wouldn't be so many people on welfare.

[vaylorie]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

well maybe if your kind didn't insist on preaching the "abstinence only" policy, there wouldn't be so many people on welfare.

Don't get what your point is here....
More Abstinence = More People on Welfare?

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by vaylorie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Don't get what your point is here....
More Abstinence = More People on Welfare?

Abstinence Only policy was not really in favor of abstinence, it was in opposition to the use of birth control, and this opposition was couched in terms of religion, making it a sin to use birth control. What then happened was that religious people who didn't want to sin fucked (who the fuck is really gonna be abstinent [except Harrison, who can't get laid], amirite?) without condoms, leading to more births.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

well maybe if your kind didn't insist on preaching the "abstinence only" policy, there wouldn't be so many people on welfare.

My kind? idk what you are referring to.

My guild
My race
My sex
My regional location

?? you're going to have to elaborate as to what group you are throwing me into. Especially seeing how I don't preach "abstinence only" lol

Also, since when does welfare = homeless?