Spells: Shadow Knights & Vampiric Embrace

[Zeelot]

The spell is no different for necro/SK and never was. It's the exact same spell for both. It's also working as it should and doing the amount of damage it should be doing. That casters-realm is inaccurate and only lists the max dmg at level 22 (inaccurately). It lists the same max damage as 31 well past 2002 and luclin - and it was never maxed at 31 then either. Always 72 at level 60.

[Brinkman]

Originally Posted by Zeelot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The spell is no different for necro/SK and never was. It's the exact same spell for both. It's also working as it should and doing the amount of damage it should be doing. That casters-realm is inaccurate and only lists the max dmg at level 22 (inaccurately). It lists the same max damage as 31 well past 2002 and luclin - and it was never maxed at 31 then either. Always 72 at level 60.

Suppose that could be so, I dont claim to know 100%... but after limited research there are posts making it at least worth more research.


Id take a post from 2001 any day

Over someone simply saying " this is the way it was, I promise "

If you are sure, I assume there will be no problem finding the obvious proof.

[Zeelot]

Yep I'm looking. I could very well be wrong, but I'm pretty sure. Of course there needs to be obvious proof to warrant changing it as well.

[Zeelot]

Found this browsing around if it helps:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Brinkman]

Originally Posted by Zeelot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yep I'm looking. I could very well be wrong, but I'm pretty sure. Of course there needs to be obvious proof to warrant changing it as well.

I would say there would need to be overwhelming proof its wrong to change it. I agree.