Netanyahu Raises Political Will for Iran Invasion. Zionist Press:"Iran Rattles Saber"

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by deakolt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you're not the messenger buddy you're part of the problem

Out of curiosity, how do you figure? I assume you view yourself as a part of the solution, insofar as you do care about the United States' popular appeal in the Arab world. Why? What about that makes it "better"? I care about the best interests of the United States and its allies -- I'm unapologetic about that, as I'm a United States citizen. That doesn't mean I'm down to enslave the rest of humanity, but I don't care what Mohammad Abdul of Jordan thinks about me or my country. I really don't. I don't support infringing on his rights, but I'm perfectly fine with him hating me.

Fundamentalist Muslims hate us because of stupid shit like Christianity, globalization, and our influence in Saudi Arabia (read: mecca). There's no winning those guys over. Fuck 'em. Unfortunately, they're by and large the ones in power, and they use their religion to create a culture of unity that necessarily pits the Arab world against Western, non-Islamic influence. It is what it is.

[purest]

lol he's still beating that dead horse

his "smoking gun" is a totally unsourced allegation, the only known source of which is a well known forgery

Originally Posted by Daldolma's proof

The agency did not say where the evidence came from, nor did it provide many details about the allegations.

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by purest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol he's still beating that dead horse

his "smoking gun" is a totally unsourced allegation, the only known source of which is a well known forgery



LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

You seem invested in this. I'm sorry that you were incorrect. An IAEA report does not = un-sourced. The IAEA is the source. They are a UN-backed international watchdog organization. They don't need to provide footnotes for Project 1999 frequent poster purest's approval.

[purest]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You seem invested in this. I'm sorry that you were incorrect. An IAEA report does not = un-sourced. The IAEA is the source. They are a UN-backed international watchdog organization. They don't need to provide footnotes for Project 1999 frequent poster purest's approval.

Originally Posted by Your source

The agency did not say where the evidence came from, nor did it provide many details about the allegations.

aka 100% unsourced

english mother fucker, do you speak it?

[purest]

Originally Posted by NY Times

The agency did not say where the evidence came from, nor did it provide many details about the allegations.

Originally Posted by Daldolma

They do not need to provide evidence.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[purest]

Originally Posted by Daldolma

They do not need to provide evidence.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[HeallunRumblebelly]

Nuclear weapons are a strange lot.

As soon as xyz country gets a nuke or two and a capable delivery system (or really not even that in the case of iran, being just a short jaunt over iraq to the greater israel area) they get political power. Why do you think europe stopped fighting? :P

The interesting outcome of this would be if we didn't stop nuclear proliferation, two things would result. One would be that as smaller and smaller subdivisions had nuclear capabilities, they could essentially make themselves smaller and smaller countries, as invasion would become less of a possibility, buuut...

With greater amounts of stockpiles of varying degrees of security, it could also lead to accidents, and nuclear accidents are just the worst kind of accidents o_O

Makes you wonder though--what would we say if Greece or something was developing nuclear power in an attempt to become energy self-sufficient? How would the EU respond to that? (I'm not familiar with Greece's situation in that regard and I realize it's an impossibility economically for that country, just curious if a friendly nation would begin developing it what would be the end result? Or are 'friendly nations' synonomous with 'nuclear nations' ?)

[Tommy_Wiseau]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You seem invested in this. I'm sorry that you were incorrect. An IAEA report does not = un-sourced. The IAEA is the source. They are a UN-backed international watchdog organization. They don't need to provide evidence.

no