Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2011, 03:36 AM
rivalxl rivalxl is offline
Orc


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
the higher level snare is .2 seconds faster casting, dont think they can do anything about the 30 seconds issue without a client modification =/
Sadly that .2 seconds is not worth 20 mana till you are much higher level then when you get it, and even then its kind of a toss up.
  #2  
Old 10-28-2011, 04:19 AM
Macken Macken is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 736
Default

Can't remember beta name.

I now understand why a minority of people can't understand why free trade pvp is the only way.

They are still stuck on trying to figure out if re-charging is a good idea or not.

I cannot expect a community who doesn't even understand the consequences of re-charging to understand such advanced concepts as the consequences of +/- 4 level range pvp.

Those of you who are still confused and who are not ready for pvp 102, can send me a tell in the months and years coming up when you feel you have advanced far enough in pvp intelligence to try the advanced courses.
  #3  
Old 10-28-2011, 05:18 AM
Cwall Cwall is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Can't remember beta name.

I now understand why a minority of people can't understand why free trade pvp is the only way.

They are still stuck on trying to figure out if re-charging is a good idea or not.

I cannot expect a community who doesn't even understand the consequences of re-charging to understand such advanced concepts as the consequences of +/- 4 level range pvp.

Those of you who are still confused and who are not ready for pvp 102, can send me a tell in the months and years coming up when you feel you have advanced far enough in pvp intelligence to try the advanced courses.
lol i can't believe you still think anybody gives a shit about what you say
  #4  
Old 10-28-2011, 05:43 AM
Lovely Lovely is offline
Fire Giant

Lovely's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 828
Default

If anyone wanna waste their time farming clickers before 50 I highly welcome them. You won't even have enough PP to recharge them anyway unless you waste 10 levels farming platinum to kill a few people at low levels.

If anything should have a nerf it's Golem Metal Wands. They are so overpowered it's almost beyond retarded. You strip every single buff a player has in 0.1 second and then easily kill them. Recharging them for 300pp is no issue at all. Casters can farm way over 1k per hour at several locations and you don't even need half a Golem Metal Wand to ensure 100% victory in a battle.

Personally I don't really care if you nerf recharging or not but if you do. Then Golem Metal Wand is the one to nerf the most. Same with Ivandyr's hoop but I think it's already been nerfed due to blue99 abusing it on raids?
  #5  
Old 10-28-2011, 06:14 AM
Galacticus Galacticus is offline
Fire Giant

Galacticus's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 988
Default

Evil 50 mage 32 Bard 21 sk



Spell System - Generally Good / Bad? Any tweaks needed?


Generally Good. I would like more evidence of resists on different resist gear levels. I have noticed my MR go up but my ability to resist magic effects has not gone up with it from what I can recognize. There needs to be some solid testing with resist numbers.

I want to see at 0 fire resist you never resist fire spells , and when you have like 150 you always resist them.



Dynamic PVP System - Since it's been working now.. Good / Bad?

I think PC cons should reflect the Dynamic PVP system. I like how it worked while leveling, but once I hit 50, I would target someone from a distance, they would con blue, and I chase them across the zone just to see they are out of my level range, you can con blue to a 50 at like 38 or something.

PvP Range - Seems good to me.

I think that the melee damage that mobs do to players is too high/hit too often OR players aren't hitting hard or often enough. It should be a one to one ratio.

The way that damage should scale for players is much like how the mage pets are. At 35 my mage pet would quad for 28 with some 8/38 weapons. At 35 a warrior with the current system would have a round like this: miss miss 18 12.

I remember it would always be more dps to use 1 handers for pve. My friends Ranger and Warrior both do way more damage with a 2 hander.
  #6  
Old 10-28-2011, 01:16 PM
Macken Macken is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cwall [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
lol i can't believe you still think anybody gives a shit about what you say
I thought it was obvious to everyone that I don't care what anyone of you thinks. I merely point out the obvious truth, and wait for time to elapse so that i can say i told you so 6-12 months from now. I did it on VZTZ and i'm doing it now. I can go back to pwnedemu.com forums or whatever they are and it's full of prognostications that ALL came true. It's an "i told you so" bonanza extravaganza.

You all are a bunch of clueless morons and this last 6 months on this forum has enlightened me as to why I'm always at the top of all the leaderboards and #1 on those that i actually try at.

It's because you are no competition. And the reason you are never any competition for me is because you are all confused and have no clue what it is you are doing.

My greatest fear on this forum is giving out too much information and clues to those who are wise enough to catch on.

However, Cwall, you are not one of them.
  #7  
Old 10-29-2011, 11:31 AM
Aenor Aenor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Can't remember beta name.
You forgot? Well log in real quick and tell us! What a douche bag..
  #8  
Old 10-29-2011, 12:44 PM
Macken Macken is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aenor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What a douche bag..
Please refrain from personal attacks outside Rant and Flames.

We are trying to clean up this server and rid it of players like yourself, failmoon and softcore.
  #9  
Old 10-29-2011, 01:42 PM
Aenor Aenor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Please refrain from personal attacks outside Rant and Flames.

We are trying to clean up this server and rid it of players like yourself, failmoon and softcore.
Please refrain from making personal attacks against the devs I.E. Saying dynamic range was a "stupid" idea when the attempt was made in response to player input.

Also, I know reading is hard but the rules of the thread were state your in game name with your comments. Saying whoops I forgot my char name is retarded. Listen we know you have a learning disability it's ok just try to follow rules.
  #10  
Old 10-29-2011, 02:35 PM
Macken Macken is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aenor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Please refrain from making personal attacks against the devs I.E. Saying dynamic range was a "stupid" idea when the attempt was made in response to player input.

Also, I know reading is hard but the rules of the thread were state your in game name with your comments. Saying whoops I forgot my char name is retarded. Listen we know you have a learning disability it's ok just try to follow rules.
First of all you need to look up "personal". As a matter of scientifc and literary fact, the word "stupid" is an adjective describing the noun "idea". Scientifically and literarily speaking and factually for that matter, an idea cannot be a PERSON. The reason for this will take longer to explain than this forum has room or attention for. For now, just listen to those who know more than you, and can see past their own nose.

Second of all, I travel for a living. I do not pack up my computer that has eqemu installed on it on very many trips. Since there has been relatively no eq pvp for 7 months now, I wouldn't even be close to caring or remembering a beta name that i spent limited time on. Nor do i have the ability to access it currently. On a forum where the average intelligence is in the "dumb" range, and the attention span is 5 seconds and on a thread where the topic parameters are ignored by more than a few, I will follow the herd mentality.

Third of all, as you can see above you are consistantly wrong on more than a few topics. Some seem to think the pvp world was just invented and we have no past records and experiences from which to rely on. You can't seem to see past your nose, your imagination is lacking, while a few of us can see it from all sides, in and out, around and about - not because we are smarter than you - but because we are wiser.

Most topics on this forum have already been inspected, disected and settled over a decade ago, yet this community and staff acts as if they need to reinvent the wheel.

There is a reason the live staff created SZ. I've already spilled the beans as to why...the staff largely has been silent on that topic. They are about to find out, if they havn't figured it out already.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.