Did he really.....

Vile · #1 10-20-2011, 02:01 PM

It's my sig because it's hilarious.. he was mocking someone.

Macken · #2 10-20-2011, 02:02 PM

Thank God.

Vile · #3 10-20-2011, 02:02 PM

It was in response to this:

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotstud [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

P.S. Like I said a mechanic where zoning while not in PvP then immediately being engaged on other side that allows you to zone back immediately and plug without punishment would be fine. I'm all for punishing zone plugging where someone runs to a zone to escape PvP that started while they were playing. It does need to account for this specific situation though where you zone into a new area and are immediately attacked.

Ceros · #4 10-20-2011, 02:10 PM

so, of course, it made perfect sense to quote Null out of context in your sig - because there's not enough anxiety about R99 already. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Vile · #5 10-21-2011, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ceros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so, of course, it made perfect sense to quote Null out of context in your sig - because there's not enough anxiety about R99 already. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I quoted him because his response was funny.

If you click the little arrow in the quote it brings you to the thread where he says that.

Not my fault there are stupid people who will read it out of context.

Macken · #6 10-20-2011, 02:27 PM

Oh, the zoneplugging issue.

Can anyone expound and explain to me why the staff is adding in code that is not classic, but when some suggestions are made to "improve" the server, the answer is no, because it's "not classic".

If you are going to make the server "worse" by taking out target rings, taking out ducking interrupts, adding a los check at end of cast... you know adding in supposed "classic" features that were recognized as inferior and changed, then what's wrong with adding in the other classic features of some pvp servers such as leaderboard, ffa 6-50 free trade pvp etc... that would make the server more pvpable?

Why not take out item links? That's definately not classic.

Wouldn't the truthful answer be "because that's the way i want it."?

Despite the overwhelming evidence that dynamic range pvp is a horrible idea, (why that wasn't obvious from the beginning is troublesome to me), it appears the staff is bull-headed and hell-bent on implementing this horrible non-classic code anyway over everyone's dead bodies.

It's like the staff should google "the law of unintended consequences" and report back to the community in essay form to reclaim community trust in their decisions.

**nilbog** · #7 10-20-2011, 02:35 PM

/tar macken

All you do is bitch.

stfu

Macken · #8 10-20-2011, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

/tar macken

All you do is bitch.

stfu

u mad?

lordyamish · #9 10-21-2011, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

/tar macken

All you do is bitch.

stfu

bangorang

gloinz · #10 10-20-2011, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Despite the overwhelming evidence that dynamic range pvp is a horrible idea, (why that wasn't obvious from the beginning is troublesome to me)

TROUBLESOME YOU SAY???

why yes my good chap this is indeed troublesome let us discuss this over tea and cakes

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]