![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Classic resist system or Null's non-classic system? | |||
| Keep the resist system as classic as possible |
|
67 | 60.91% |
| Add Null's VZ/TZ bastardization that isn't classic |
|
43 | 39.09% |
| Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
I don't really care if it's Classic or whatever else. I just want it to be good and balanced. I get the classic feel no matter how resists are, maybe that's just me
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
I'd like to see disabling spells follow the classic resist system with DoTs and damage spells under a modified system. What falls into disabling spells is up for debate though. Obviously, root and snare are a given, but I'm not sure what to make of stuns, spin stuns (with current p99 code), mez, etc.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
I have an idea, bring up beta so we can test this and then we can talk shit about this new system.
I'd like to stay classic but I'm willing to test this new implementation. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|