![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:
![]() "You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
This is going to get really fun when it comes to fighting over epic mobs and stealing mod rods during AoW... You know what would be better than a raid mob rotation? More use of the rants and flames board! At least gives me something fun to read. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
you know guys, after reading this thread i do understand now why
1.) sony created instanced zones on life 2.) i played on pvp servers, since there was an easy solution to claim camps there
__________________
Mitic<Transatlantic Nihilum> | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
Feel free to continue pretending that I am the idiot. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
1) The crux of the issue is there is not enough raid content to go around for those capable of raiding it. 2) Therefore, this implies the fix is either: a) Generate enough raid content to go around, or b) Ration the existing raid content in a fair and even manner. If you think (1) is false, I'm not sure why all these threads are appearing regarding all the raid content disputes and I guess the discussion stops here, doesn't it? Therefore, I think we can agree (1) is true. Therefore, if (1) is true, then the solution is for there to be enough raid content to go around for those capable of raiding it. (2) contains the two means by which to do so... a) generate more content, or b) take the existing content and distribute it evenly. Can you think of more options to create enough raid content to go around? I can't. Be my guest. I guess there's option c) reduce the population of the server, but I figured that'd be off the table. :P
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:
![]() "You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
No, intelligently address the questions I asked instead of just tossing out a link. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Unless you can't...
Or, to spell it out for you, if you think there are more than two options than the ones I presented as possible solutions, what did you have in mind? Without just blurting out "FALSE DICHOTOMY!!!!!!! HURRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!" and concluding that you've sufficiently made your case.
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:
![]() "You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles | ||
|
Last edited by YendorLootmonkey; 04-06-2010 at 07:38 PM..
|
|
||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Never happen but this what I'd do: have raid-designated mobs apply a tag to all those that registered a successful melee hit or spell cast at the death of said raid mob. Then disallow any such tagged player from hitting or landing a spell on any other raid-designated for some duration of time. Pick your target but can't have them all. Its a lame solution but people completely incapable of sharing and that will go out their way to prevent others from experiencing content is pretty lame too.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|