Little GM intervention as possible

[Harrison]

Hmmm, opinions from terrible servers. Very valid.

[Doors]

Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hmmm, opinions from terrible servers. Very valid.

Doesn't matter if the server was terrible dude. Most of us speak from experience. And thats who I would want to listen to if I was designing a PVP box and wanted input on how to properly do it. I wouldn't be listening to people that had no clue.

[Arclyte]

....all the while both Rogean's and the server's reputation hang in the balance.

GM intervention, while more relaxed than P99, is guaranteed. I think leaving the integrity of the server solely to some nebulous "council of guild leaders" is stupid at best, the thrice failure of VZTZ notwithstanding.

Common sense and over a decade of MMOs tells me it will require the vigilance of both.

[solid]

Originally Posted by Arclyte [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the thrice failure of VZTZ notwithstanding.

Not fair to say 2.0 was a failure; server was humming along fine and pop was on the up and up until zoneCMD blew the box up (which had nothing to do with a ruleset or GM intervention)