Are we allowed to like AI art?

[BradZax]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[OriginalContentGuy]

Either that's a computer generated image featuring a three-meter tall giant in the bottom left or it's the chemical transporters in Exlax's head when he posts words.

Or a third thing why not.

[BradZax]

idk but i literally can't imagine humans in 2500 not arguing if that is a real photograph though.

[Ekco]

@Kaia is this real?

[Ekco]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...nt-know-either

Kaia, block everyone who replied to or quota tweeted this.

[BradZax]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...nt-know-either

Kaia, block everyone who replied to or quota tweeted this.

I hope if the AI kills its masters, the first people it kills are the programmers who put guide rails on the AI so it doesn’t say shit that normie is retards think is dangerous.

[Ekco]

Told 4.6 to do a full codebase review and refactor of my chatbot and it did it in about 10 minutes finding all kinds of shit wrong gemini 3 and Claude 4.5 did

[OriginalContentGuy]

Proximity to information is neither the same as practice nor mastery. In practice I want no proximity to the people selling the hype the most.

I'm not blind but I'm also not buying into a lifestyle nor a model where a YouTuber channel called AI Strategy Daily is successfully monetizing himself at my expense.

[OriginalContentGuy]

Conversely you Ekco seem to be doing really cool stuff that's at least entertaining and so how are you leveraging the hours you're spending on this into something other people can support? And isn't it at least a little bit of a conflict of interest that a guy who gets validation for his work has a vested interest in the presuppositions behind it? Not throwing shade I like you enough to consider supporting your doings.