Shovel's new account?
Either way our current administration and supported companies are going about AI in a way that is more costly and reminds me of the tech bubble that will pop. Investors poured money into AI with weak or non-existent business models, valuing them on "eyeballs" (traffic) and growth potential, not revenue or profit.
The silly Stargate Project, which involves a pledge by this administration to invest up to $500 billion in AI infrastructure in the U.S. is for over four years (the length of a presidency). You can thank him for the silly overly wasteful investment into further bankrupting America under a party who consistently shows little understanding and education in their base.
For example - DeepSeek uses less hardware by employing aggressive software and architectural optimizations like Mixture of Experts (MoE), which activates only parts of the model, plus techniques like Mixed Precision Training (FP8), DualPipe for better GPU communication, gradient checkpointing, and custom PTX/CUDA programming for hyper-efficient GPU control, dramatically cutting memory and compute needs without sacrificing performance, making powerful AI accessible on more modest memory setups. Cost effectively we are going about developing AI the wrong way compared to other countries with similar shared success.
It is ironic the man in the video and his ilk are partially responsible for their gripe.
| 
12-16-2025, 12:43 AM
Linear Mode
