AC softcap and low level hardcap discussion

[Jimjam]

If the squelching point maps on to the softcap does that mean returns after softcap aren’t being made? Or is it ‘Wrath’ is balanced to fizzle out against players with mitigation from worn ac meeting the softcap?

I’m a bit confused.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the squelching point maps on to the softcap does that mean returns after softcap aren’t being made? Or is it ‘Wrath’ is balanced to fizzle out against players with mitigation from worn ac meeting the softcap?

I’m a bit confused.

My current theory is the "squelch point" isn't a separate thing. It is just what people are calling the softcap.

Softcap returns can be quite low, especially if the EQEMU numbers are correct for non-warriors.

At 0.17 softcap return, the possible Ranger value, 50 AC over the softcap is reduced to 8.5 AC. At higher levels 8 AC probably isn't going to change much on a parse.

If 0.17 is the softcap return for Rangers, a Ranger with 200 AC above the softcap would only be getting 34 AC after the softcap reduction. A shield like buckler of insight with 45 AC would possibly be better than 200 AC over the softcap in this scenario for Rangers, as shields raise your softcap.