Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 07-23-2025, 11:03 AM
azeth azeth is offline
Planar Protector

azeth's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
real problem is the class name, the definition of Magician is literally a Enchanter

i assume Conjurer is trademarked by DnD or belongs to Tolkien or someshit.
Id argue Tim the Enchanter was a Sorcerer, too
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Endonde View Post
Yea well you know, 6 years of Velious everything has been killed, only thing left to do is speedrun killing Detoxx guilds.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07-23-2025, 11:09 AM
zelld52 zelld52 is offline
Fire Giant

zelld52's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 978
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Id argue Tim the Enchanter was a Sorcerer, too
Tim: "I'm an Enchanter."

You: You look like a Sorcerer.

what kind of bigot would miss-class a man who clearly states his preferred class description?
__________________
"From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be remember’d;
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother..."
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 08-31-2025, 05:25 PM
Drueric Drueric is offline
Sarnak

Drueric's Avatar

Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 231
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 08-31-2025, 05:27 PM
Drueric Drueric is offline
Sarnak

Drueric's Avatar

Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 231
Default

https://imgur.com/a/8QhzF9N
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 08-31-2025, 05:28 PM
Drueric Drueric is offline
Sarnak

Drueric's Avatar

Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 231
Default

They nerfed pet spells.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 09-14-2025, 03:35 AM
Xer0 Xer0 is offline
Fire Giant

Xer0's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They're probably talking about the recent change that screwed up pet attack range. It may have been non-classic before (too long) but the change also made it non-classic (much too short).
I really don't understand. In the discussion about the patch they openly admit the change was made in order to make the game "feel more classic"-- that the pet tracking exploit was classic, but people are abusing it.

I dont mind it tbh, but only if we drop the "classic" pretense that comes with every discussion.

Why change this, but keep the "classic bug" that causes you to lose all buffs when zoning with low life?

Pick a lane FFS.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 09-14-2025, 04:02 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,560
Default

From what I understand that ‘bug’ was there as a hot fix to prevent characters from dieing when zoning on low hp. Idk if true or could be fixed better here. I don’t really mind it too much, conveys a cool ‘close to death’ impression.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 09-14-2025, 04:08 AM
Xer0 Xer0 is offline
Fire Giant

Xer0's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
From what I understand that ‘bug’ was there as a hot fix to prevent characters from dieing when zoning on low hp. Idk if true or could be fixed better here. I don’t really mind it too much, conveys a cool ‘close to death’ impression.
Regardless. They're clearly in the business of implementing mechanics that are objectively NOT classic. So the idea that they're just leaving it in place because "shits classic" is nonsense.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 09-14-2025, 04:09 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,560
Default

Inscrutible dev intentions is classic.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 09-14-2025, 04:12 AM
Xer0 Xer0 is offline
Fire Giant

Xer0's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Inscrutible dev intentions is classic.
I think the word you're looking for is "insufferable"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.