![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Ever /report a playa?
(nope) ![]() | |||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Regular old guilds are more user-friendly and better able to meet the demands of the MMO which typically offers more rewards than the RPG side of the game. it's already a PITA trying to accomplish x, y, z during the original timeline, what with all of the bottlenecks and clusterfucks, but then suddenly all of that ass pain is increased for a guild when its class options are restricted by the one race they've chosen to fit a theme. A solution to this would be to allow for one or two more races.
A human-only guild could manage well enough, facing no setbacks if barbarians and erudites were included. Same but to a lesser extent with gnomes, if they were to include dwarves and halflings. Wood elves, high elves, and half elves wouldn't have access to feign death, and it would be hard to explain away the inclusion of dark elves. Ogres and trolls would need a shit ton of reapers to compensate for having no clerics, and their one bard with da oogly stick would be working overtime. At least iksars would have more bards, not to mention rogues, plus monks and necromancers. Not great but still. On their own, erudites would get bards and rogues, assuming again that masks are allowed, but the lack of warriors would be a nagging setback, largely confining them to content from Kunark and earlier. | ||
|
Last edited by Ennewi; 07-30-2025 at 11:56 AM..
| |||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
No, you're a son of Erud, or you're not. The matter is simple.
__________________
Ever /report a playa?
(nope) ![]() | |||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Alternatively, a thematic guild could be formed after the fact, with the majority of its members having already acquired BIS, allowing them to push their classes to the limit on content that would provide a challenge and remain profitable. This seems like more of possibility as the servers continue to age. After every guild/player has every item/experience they wanted, what then? Either make alts, complete solo artist challenges, or delevel back to one and revisit old content twinked to the hilt. Doing so, as a thematic guild, would add a layer of challenge to the attempt at higher levels.
| ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
You are no son of Erud, and it shows.
__________________
Ever /report a playa?
(nope) ![]() | |||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
When someone says "dark men", even if literally describing skin tone, the cultural baggage makes it sound like you're conflating race and morality, even if that wasn’t your intent. There are so many other words you could pick that couldn't be construed as racist. Why not <High Men of Odus>? <High Council of Erudin>, <Disciples of Erud>, literally anything else. It just seems like an insensitive thing to name an Erudite-only guild.
__________________
Green:
Rimurok 60 Ogre Shadowknight <Castle> Nilwen 60 Ogre Druid <Castle> Pygnomaniac 4 GnOgre Wizard <Castle> Mirnimhirnsvirf 13 Cancermancer <Castle> __________________ Green: ACTIVE Blue: INACTIVE Red: INACTIVE Quarm is love Quarm is life | |||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
But at the same time, I raise to you this:
__________________
Green:
Rimurok 60 Ogre Shadowknight <Castle> Nilwen 60 Ogre Druid <Castle> Pygnomaniac 4 GnOgre Wizard <Castle> Mirnimhirnsvirf 13 Cancermancer <Castle> __________________ Green: ACTIVE Blue: INACTIVE Red: INACTIVE Quarm is love Quarm is life | |||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
1) Dark doesn't need to be defined. It can be left mysterious, just like how certain texts rely on interpretation of the reader, part of that interpretation adds to the mystery and the fun of it. However -- 2) Let's hypothetically grant your point and say Dark is linked to skin color, and that is what it refers to (this is hypothetical, I will reiterate, this is not what I am claiming). My question is, what is your point if it is? That's not racist, that's a descriptor. It's not assigning character qualities neither positive or negative, it's a physical descriptor speaking to a demographic. There is nothing inheriently racist about this. It's the same thing as asking about a person's race on a population census. There is neither positive nor negative qualities about this, merely used as a tool in human languages as a descriptor. The problem is that it is YOU that are assigning some kind of nefarious meaning to a certain type of physical description. Your personal (and illogical) inference betrays exactly what you think about certain types of people, and that simply by mentioning a physical descriptor that it carries a negative connotation. The only logical justification to explain your interpretation is that you have some kind of inherent bias and racism you are applying to the term, and that you are projecting that interpretation on others. You're actually the problem here, assuming that's what you meant. I'll be charitable and assume you don't actually mean that however, do you? These sub 100 Int Antonicans man. Gotta spell out literally everything for them.
__________________
Ever /report a playa?
(nope) ![]() | |||
|
Last edited by ya.dingus; 07-30-2025 at 07:45 PM..
| ||||
![]() |
|
|