Moss covered Twig

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I didn't "artificially change my numbers" or do a "fake parse". You are just making things up. The first parse was a quick guess. A shot from the hip, and it still shows spikes at 8 damage, 21 damage, and 25 damage. That parse doesn't help you, it helps me.

So, it's not a fake parse, it's a... fake.. parse? Do you even read what you post?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, it's not a fake parse, it's a... fake.. parse? Do you even read what you post?

Neither parse is fake. They are both outputs from my DPS calculator. You can double check the results yourself. I told you the parameters. But we know you won't, because you are scared to admit you are wrong.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=154

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=167

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But any output from your DPS calculator is going to be a fake parse. It's not a real source.

People can use my DPS calculator themselves. It doesn't matter how many times you lie about it. You are still wrong.

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, please remind me what this has to do with the threat of moss covered twig? You're just spamming more nonsense and bullshit.

You can stop spamming the thread with lies at any time.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Neither parse is fake. They are both outputs from my DPS calculator. You can double check the results yourself. I told you the parameters. But we know you won't, because you are scared to admit you are wrong.

But any output from your DPS calculator is going to be a fake parse. It's not a real source.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

People can use my DPS calculator themselves. It doesn't matter how many times you lie about it. You are still wrong.

The only lie I see is where you said the numbers were made up but then said it was a legit parse. You got caught in another lie, and it looks like you're trying to dodge it, again. And ultimately, any output from your calculator is illegitimate. It is not a real parse because it is not a parse from the game. You need to quit trying to pass your bullshit made up numbers as real numbers and then lying about it.

Also, please remind me what this has to do with the threat of moss covered twig? You're just spamming more nonsense and bullshit.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can stop spamming the thread with lies at any time.

Love how you refuse to address the actual lies you post when you get called out. You just pretend like you never said it.

[Zuranthium]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The first parse was a quick guess.

You said your first parse was against a Level 40 MOB. Already a more difficult MOB than many parses done in 1999/2000.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it still shows spikes at 8 damage, 21 damage, and 25 damage.

That doesn't equate to being the same percentage. No matter what you try to say, you are getting less min hits and more upper range hits than what was actually happening back then.

For those who are interested in the actual accurate history of Everquest, and as has already been linked in the thread by other sources who described the situation (which you continue to ignore), the Twig and Whip during those days were BIS and caused an uproar that caused them to be nerfed.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You said your first parse was against a Level 40 MOB. Already a more difficult MOB than many parses done in 1999/2000.

Again, you don't know what mobs the 46 Warrior parsed. They didn't say. You need to stop claiming you do know.

People can look at this post and decide for themselves who is more credible:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=167

[zelld52]

This thread reminds me of this guy who was playing shaman that joined my guild after playing EQ for the first time on Project 1999 in the Summer of 2024. They did "research" into the most effective ways to do combat as a shaman - including scouring these very forums for "info" about how the game mechanics work.

They spent the next 6 months arguing with everybody they came into contact with about the "most efficient" way to solo as a shaman. I found myself trapped in a loop with them - they always said, with confidence, things that contradicted my first-hand experience (having levelled 3 shaman to 60 on P99 Green since 2021).

This rubbed me, and others the wrong way - so I just put them on /ignore after a few weeks seeing various arguments others (and myself) would have in /guild with them. The general consensus around the person was that they were a know-it-all that refused to ever admit fault in their logic, and furthermore: this guy was a fool for trying to tell people who have been playing P99 regularly for years that their first-hand experience was invalid.

Guy quit p99 before the calendar dinged 2025, but in a short time he really made a name for himself as a jackass.

[Goregasmic]

Arguing can be a good thing but when it is two people fighting over intangible bullshit and then everyone that doesn't like those arguing pile on for 20 pages of bullshit is just lame.

A lot of people on here need to learn to agree to disagree and just drop it instead of poisoning every thread. There's excellent info on here but when it becomes invariably buried under 40 pages of crap it does a disservice to everyone.

[zelld52]

Originally Posted by Goregasmic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A lot of people on here need to learn to agree to disagree and just drop it instead of poisoning every thread.

Sir, this is a forum for an emulated 26-year-old game that requires a heavy time commitment to excel at, aka the Waffle House of game forums.

But, I agree with you lol

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Goregasmic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Arguing can be a good thing but when it is two people fighting over intangible bullshit and then everyone that doesn't like those arguing pile on for 20 pages of bullshit is just lame.

A lot of people on here need to learn to agree to disagree and just drop it instead of poisoning every thread. There's excellent info on here but when it becomes invariably buried under 40 pages of crap it does a disservice to everyone.

The pile on is the problem, I agree. These threads always start normal, and then a poster like Samoht will come in and start trolling. Other trolls pile on. It's been a problem for years. When people disagree with them they will post anything to ruin the conversation.

Unfortunately no one else calls out this bad behavior, so the trolls have a perfect environment. Often times people side with the trolls too. This ends up encouraging the trolls to keep going. I've been telling people to call out this behavior for years, but they don't. So the problem continues.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The pile on is the problem, I agree. These threads always start normal, and then a poster like Samoht will come in and start trolling. Other trolls pile on. It's been a problem for years. When people disagree with them they will post anything to ruin the conversation.

Unfortunately no one else calls out this bad behavior, so the trolls have a perfect environment. Often times people side with the trolls too. This ends up encouraging the trolls to keep going. I've been telling people to call out this behavior for years, but they don't. So the problem continues.

Pssst... He's talking about you, not me.