Myconid Spore King - Monk Solo

[bcbrown]

Not interested. Don't drag me into your silly argument.

[shovelquest]

*insult [hits send]

"My code is up for review!"

*not interested dont drag me into this [hits send again]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not interested. Don't drag me into your silly argument.

I just posted the fact that you ran into one of Loramin's bugs on the wiki page he created for my DPS calculator without my permission. That contributed to your poor view of my DPS calculator.

Anybody can look at my DPS calculator thread. I am not sure why you are getting defensive about a fact and a post everybody can read.

I am the only person in this thread who has had harm done to them by someone creating a wiki page for them without their permission. The person who created that wiki page for me without my permission was Loramin.

He did a bad job on the implementation, and blames me for that lol. He even admitted to not testing his own code, so he knowingly put up an untested wiki page for another user without their permission:

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

P.S. It's also untested, so I make no promises about it being bug free [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am not sure why you keep lying about my DPS calculator if you aren't interested, and don't want to check the code yourself.

[zelld52]

i read page 1 and then skipped to page 100. the continuity is broken on this thread

[Zuranthium]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I did explain it in the page

You did not. I literally just quoted the one single line you put on top of the page - "This is his version of the solo artist challenge". That is not an accurate description, and no description would change how the title of the page was falsely named.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are just unable to compromise

That's what you've been doing.

Even more hilariously, you're trying to say anyone who doesn't exactly agree with you is "not compromising" (and nobody agrees with you, except for 1 other very selfish person who is simply mad about the fact that soloing with no outside buffs or consumables is a way tons of people play the game and have completed solo challenges).

Originally Posted by Stryker85 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My gripe with proposed changes is that it would prevent any melee character from EVER achieving an S+ grade on literally ANY mob past the Grandmaster tier.

That's not true, and most melee classes can't do much even with outside buffs, it's mainly just Monks. Most casters are also not able to: Wizards, Clerics, Mages, Druids. And also even when being allowed buffs, no melee character did it in Kunark era anyway.

Your entire viewpoint is just that you want Monks (yourself) to be more "competitive" with Enchanters and Shaman. That is not the purpose of the challenges. It's not a battle of each player being limited to 1 specific class or trying to have rules that allow every class to compete equally; that is not possible in the first place. EQ is EQ, things are vastly imbalanced when it comes to the soloing capability different classes have.

The point of the solo challenges is to see how far each specific class can go. Completing an encounter at S- tier with a certain class could be comparatively more impressive than doing it at S+ tier with another class. Your S tier kill is the highest tier achieved in a public video as a Monk for that encounter. Instead of being glad to have achieved the current highest tier for a Monk, you're trying to tear down other people and rage against changes most people have said make sense. Changes that are objectively the much more accurate way to categorize videos and allow players to search for examples of things to try themselves.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You did not. I literally just quoted the one single line you put on top of the page - "This is his version of the solo artist challenge". That is not an accurate description, and no description would change how the title of the page was falsely named.

You misquoted it, just like you misquoted OP and then insisted your misquote was correct:

"This is Zuranthium's version of the solo artist challenge wiki page."

That is factually correct. It is your edited version of the existing solo artist challenge wiki page. It doesn't say you wrote the entire page, and it says where the source came from. People can read this quote for themselves and see you are misreading it to fit your victim narrative.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You misquoted it, just like you misquoted OP and then insisted your misquote was correct:

"This is Zuranthium's version of the solo artist challenge wiki page."

That is factually correct. It is your edited version of the existing solo artist challenge wiki page. It doesn't say you wrote the entire page, and it says where the source came from. People can read this quote for themselves and see you are misreading it to fit your victim narrative.

You also undid many changes that he made on the page. Sounds more like DSM's version of the solo artist challenge.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You also undid many changes that he made on the page. Sounds more like DSM's version of the solo artist challenge.

You and Zur trolled the wiki page to give OP a lower score. The wiki edit history and the post history is clear. Somebody had to undo literal troll edits.

Now Sscalez has gone in and edited it to clean up your mess instead. Next time don't edit the wiki to win a forum argument

[Zuranthium]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"This is Zuranthium's version of the solo artist challenge wiki page."

That is factually correct.

No that isn't factually correct. It wasn't MY version. Someone editing a page does not suddenly mean all the content in it is "their version". It just means they made a fucking edit, and that's why there is edit history, instead of a new page being created every time someone makes an edit.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not that isn't factually correct. It wasn't MY version. Someone editing a page does not suddenly mean all the content in it is "their version". It just means they made a fucking edit, and that's why there is edit history, instead of a new page being created every time someone makes an edit.

Just because you don't understand file versioning, it doesn't change the facts. When a codebase is forked and some changes are made, everybody understands you didn't create the entire codebase you forked from. You took the existing codebase and made some changes. Factually you are wrong, and will continue to be wrong, even if this thread reaches 500 pages.