Myconid Spore King - Monk Solo

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It does not. People can look at the wiki and see I simply reverted your troll changes, which you admitted to:

You're being disingenuous again. That's not the page that got you suspended.

[Stryker85]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's already been proven as factually incorrect. You need to let go as well.

Wtf? No it hasn't. The VAST majority of the people that have posted in this thread have agreed that it most certainly is a solo kill, even if some think that adding an additional rank for unbuffed kills would be acceptable as well.

If you think otherwise, why don't you go make a poll in the Blue General or UN Blue discord channels and see what the vast majority of the EQ population thinks? I won't hold my breath.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Stryker85 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wtf? No it hasn't. The VAST majority of the people that have posted in this thread have agreed that it most certainly is a solo kill, even if some think that adding an additional rank for unbuffed kills would be acceptable as well.

If you think otherwise, why don't you go make a poll in the Blue General or UN Blue discord channels and see what the vast majority of the EQ population thinks? I won't hold my breath.

You're delusional. Here are some people that posted today that support changes:

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it’s laughable that the condition should still exist that it’s ok to not buff casters but melee can be buffed while still competing against the same mobs. This should absolutely be changed

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

An SAC category of only self-buffed is also a reasonable category.

Originally Posted by Goregasmic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

in a vacuum, there's a hierarchy of kills and unbuffed ranks higher.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're being disingenuous again. That's not the page that got you suspended.

There is no page on the wiki where I impersonated anyone. You can see the post where Loramin suspended me:

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As a wiki admin I had to suspend you for shitting up the wiki with your forum fights! Your addiction to warring with the forum is so bad you re-created Zura's page eight times, despite him clearly being against it (and despite said page not benefiting the community in any way).

You have a problem DSM, and your problem makes the entire community worse off for it. Deal with your shit already: stop being such a damn coward and burying your head in the sand!

Loramin didn't say I was suspended for impersonation. So you keep lying about that.

Lormain was incorrect for suspending me. He was clearly biased against me if you look at all of the posts of him attacking me directly here and in other threads. His reason at the bottom is the same ad hominem attack he's been saying for years. I could find many posts from Loramin that say the same thing over and over.

Creating a copy of Zuranthium's version of the solo artist challenge wiki that he can edit and promote is a fair compromise for the disagreements both parties have.

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You said you created it for Zuranthium and then proceeded to rage edit every change he made to revert it back to your preferred version. Thank you for providing the evidence to the crime. The suspension was well deserved.

You can check the wiki history and the post history. Lying doesn't help you.

Zuranthium kept deleting the copied page because he refused to compromise and use it.

I reverted your literal troll edits on the main wiki:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wiki has been updated with new rating for melees using raid buffs

OP now deserves a B

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, it moved him from a B- on the new scale to a B.

None of this is impersonation, and you were vandalizing the wiki to win the argument in this thread.

[Stryker85]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're delusional. Here are some people that posted today that support changes:

LOL you're not fooling anybody by taking one sentence out of context from these posts. You're such a disingenuous piece of shit, you're just cherry picking parts of their posts without including the most relevant lines.

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Stryker's kill is obviously a solo kill and obviously impressive. An accomplishment to be proud of.

I've read the thread, and you (DSM) haven't exactly covered yourself in glory in this thread either. This thread would be a lot better if you didn't spend 50 pages going back and forth with those two idiots. All that it accomplished was to detract and distract from an impressive accomplishment by Stryker.

What have you got to say about that, Samoht?? I thought this was someone that supported your argument? But here they are saying the exact opposite, and he's actually pointing out what an IDIOT you are.

Would you like me to make a post like this for every person here that's disagreed with your dumbass logic? I can certainly promise you its a whole hell of a lot more than the 2 other people that are trolling this thread with you.

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by Stryker85 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wtf? No it hasn't. The VAST majority of the people that have posted in this thread have agreed that it most certainly is a solo kill, even if some think that adding an additional rank for unbuffed kills would be acceptable as well.

It is clearly a solo kill, a very impressive one, and I think everyone except for two people agree on that.

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're delusional. Here are some people that posted today that support changes:

This is the second time you've quoted me as if I support your position so I want to state very clearly I do not.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Creating a copy of Zuranthium's version of the solo artist challenge wiki that he can edit and promote is a fair compromise for the disagreements both parties have.

You said you created it for Zuranthium and then proceeded to rage edit every change he made to revert it back to your preferred version. Thank you for providing the evidence to the crime. The suspension was well deserved.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is the second time you've quoted me as if I support your position so I want to state very clearly I do not.

It is not a misquote. Did you make the post in error?

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It is not a misquote. Did you make the post in error?

I think there should be a SAC category for unbuffed solo kills. You've said a bunch of other stupid shit in this thread, I'm not going to try to summarize it all or go back and re-read it all, but you quoted me out of context and I would appreciate if you do not try to mischaracterize me as supporting anything you said in the past or say in the future.

You're clearly trying to downplay and denigrate Stryker's impressive achievement and I want nothing to do with that.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're clearly trying to downplay and denigrate Stryker's achievement and I want nothing to do with that.

This is correct.