![]() |
|
#121
|
||||
|
Whenever parses and math are produced, you get posters like Duik, Troxx, and Croco spamming threads with trolling and nonsense.
If they think I am wrong, they could provide math and parses of their own. Sadly they don't do this. I have admitted to being wrong on these forums plenty of times, everybody can search the forum and see it. You can't say the same for posters like Troxx. I will happily do so again if better evidence than mine is provided. The simple truth remains that 1h weapons are not always as bad as people try to claim. I did a quick video + parse which shows exactly that: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=113 I showed that Epic Fist + SoS will out-DPS Imbued Fighters Staff at level 52 if you don't unequip Imbued Fighter Staff every swing. Even when unequipping IFS every swing, the DPS was matched in the video. This is why generalizations are not always great. In the low 50s the 2h damage bonus is much lower, so they aren't as good. If you just believed the generalization about 2h being better, you wouldn't know this. Remember OP is level 16. I am not sure why people are angry about this. I think it's a good thing that players have more weapon choices. Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 11-18-2024 at 11:49 AM..
| ||||
|
#122
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#123
|
||||
|
Quote:
Three minutes is enough to see if there is a vast difference between the two weapon setups. A rusty dagger that lucked out and got a 100% hit rate with all max damage rolls would still be well below the DPS of a significantly superior weapon that parsed normally in a 3 minute parse. 2hb and 1hb are 244. Hand to Hand was 230 and went to 231 in the video. So you could say the Epic Fist + SoS setup was at a bit of a disadvantage.
__________________
| |||
|
#124
|
|||
|
1) 2hander dmg bonus scales up with level. The higher level you are the more advantageous the 2h dmg bonus to 1 handed.
2) Monks triple attack mainhand at 60. I trust that most posters here are smart enough to see how this tips the scales massively in favor of 2hand weapons. 3) Thanks for a 2-3 minute parse on a level 52 monk? You successfully provided parses of woefully insufficient length on a low level scrub and want to extrapolate that to the performance of level 60 monks? Lol https://lucy.allakhazam.com/dmgbonus.html?setcookie=1 Monk primary dmg bonus at level 52 for 1handers: 9 Monk primary damage bonus at level 60 for 1handers: 11 IFS (40 delay) dmg bonus at level 52: 18 IFS (40 delay) dmg bonus at level 60: 34 So for the 1hander you had a 22% bump in dmg bonus 52 vs 60 For IFS there is an 89% bump in dmg bonus 52 vs 60 Lol Level up to 60 and try again?
__________________
| ||
|
Last edited by Troxx; 11-18-2024 at 08:14 PM..
| |||
|
#125
|
||||
|
Quote:
He still hasn't read my previous post, https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=113 which went over the damage bonus increase with level.
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 11-18-2024 at 08:15 PM..
| ||||
|
#126
|
||||
|
Quote:
I asked in part because I noticed the skill-up for h2h in the log. But the other reason I asked is because you have a 75% hit rate for the 1hb but just a 57% hit rate for 2hb. 62% hitrate for main-hand h2h, 60% for offhand h2h, so I wondered if there might be a skill disparity between 1hb and 2hb. I'd expect at the same skill level for 1h and 2h to have similar hit rates, wouldn't you? I think it must be an artifact of the small sample size. | |||
|
#127
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#128
|
|||
|
I'd be happy to heal your monk on my cleric or druid for a longer parse.
| ||
|
#129
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#130
|
|||
|
Bcbrown offered to help you get longer parses. Why did respond so rudely to that?
__________________
| ||
![]() |
|
|