Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Melee

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2024, 02:54 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

Important raid targets are rarely brief enough fights that wild variance will exist.

An 18 man Trak burn that’s takes 10 seconds? Sure a bad run luck might be present … but the fight was over so quick it didn’t matter.

Citing AoW as an example is silly though. Even with multiple charm pets and 80-100+ players … that fight is going to be long enough that the risk of nothing but bad luck is statistically really, really (REALLY) improbable.

Point is simply that no matter how you slice it, the mantra of fast weapons for the damage bonus was turned on its head. 2handers now deal more damage bonus per unit time than fast weapons.

At 60 a 2handed weapon with a delay of 30 (tstaff) for example will have a chance to apply 29 damage bonus per hit at an interval of 3 seconds (1.5 seconds at max haste).

You would need a 1hander with a starting delay of 11 (before haste) to have greater dmg bonus potential. A delay of 12 isn’t fast enough.

No such weapon exists.

Admittedly the delay of 30 is quite literally THE sweet spot. Let’s use another example.

For a 2handed weapon with a delay of 40 (IFS) … it’s 34 dmg per 4 seconds.

You would need a 1 hander (main hand) with a delay of 13 to have mathematical parity with the dmg bonus potential of the IFS and a delay of 12 to beat it.

No such weapons exist.

This is why dual wielding for monks is so generally lame at this point. There has to be a massive (BiS endgame dual wield setups) ratio advantage to compete (beat) with 38/40 or 29/30 EC monk 2hander. At that point they only win via massive ratio superiority. If you have access to those weapons, you also have access to ToV or VP 2handers (and probably many for cheaper dkp) with ratios that far outclass the EC gear.

The higher the ac, the more relative importance the portion of your damage from damage bonus.

Math is math. It really isn’t complicated.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2024, 02:56 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

Double post sorry
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2024, 09:59 PM
bcbrown bcbrown is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You would need a 1hander with a starting delay of 11 (before haste) to have greater dmg bonus potential. A delay of 12 isn’t fast enough.

No such weapon exists.
My friend, have you considered red?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-17-2024, 02:12 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You would need a 1 hander (main hand) with a delay of 13 to have mathematical parity with the dmg bonus potential of the IFS and a delay of 12 to beat it.

No such weapons exist.
You don't need mathematical parity on damage bonus, you just need to math out which set of weapons does more damage.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...4&postcount=86

People can read this post to see that a FoN + Gharns should out DPS a Primal 2hb.

As I said before, just math out both weapons and/or parse them. If they are close, the dual wield combo is going to be more consistent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Math is math. It really isn’t complicated.
Indeed. You should actually use math sometimes to support your positions. As you say, it isn't complicated.

We can use the linked post above to check TStaff's potential damage output:

46 weapon damage from the 2h in the linked post above divided by 29 weapon damage from TStaff is 1.58. The 221 max damage from the weapon example in the linked post above divided by 1.58 is 139.87.

(9 + 139.87) / 2 = 74.4 x 0.5 = 37.2 + 29 damage bonus = 66.2 damage

66.2 damage x 30 hits = 1986 damage compared to 2072 damage at least from FoN + Gharns. That damage value is a bit lower due to gharns having a slightly better ratio. I am also assuming a 50% dual wield chance, for the 2072 number, but it sounds like Monks have a higher dual wield chance than 50%. That would further increase the 2072 damage if true.

As you can see, you don't need a 1h weapon with a delay of 12 to out DPS a TStaff.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 11-17-2024 at 02:41 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-17-2024, 03:15 AM
Raralith Raralith is offline
Skeleton


Join Date: Jun 2024
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We can use the linked post above to check TStaff's potential damage output:

46 weapon damage from the 2h in the linked post above divided by 29 weapon damage from TStaff is 1.58. The 221 max damage from the weapon example in the linked post above divided by 1.58 is 139.87.

(9 + 139.87) / 2 = 74.4 x 0.5 = 37.2 + 29 damage bonus = 66.2 damage

66.2 damage x 30 hits = 1986 damage compared to 2072 damage at least from FoN + Gharns. That damage value is a bit lower due to gharns having a slightly better ratio. I am also assuming a 50% dual wield chance, for the 2072 number, but it sounds like Monks have a higher dual wield chance than 50%. That would further increase the 2072 damage if true.

As you can see, you don't need a 1h weapon with a delay of 12 to out DPS a TStaff.
Assuming the numbers check out, a 2hb tstaff is 1,986 damage vs. Tunare + Vulak weapons are 2,072 damage ignoring procs on both ends and stats you gain. A 50k 2hb from KC vs two incredibly hard to obtain BIS does 4.3% more damage? I'm assuming that doesn't even factor in 2HB weaving? As a new monk player, unless I'm the 1%, I'm basically keeping my 2HB for the vast majority of fights because it'll be more DPS? That just sounds incredibly odd.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-17-2024, 07:47 AM
PatChapp PatChapp is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raralith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Assuming the numbers check out, a 2hb tstaff is 1,986 damage vs. Tunare + Vulak weapons are 2,072 damage ignoring procs on both ends and stats you gain. A 50k 2hb from KC vs two incredibly hard to obtain BIS does 4.3% more damage? I'm assuming that doesn't even factor in 2HB weaving? As a new monk player, unless I'm the 1%, I'm basically keeping my 2HB for the vast majority of fights because it'll be more DPS? That just sounds incredibly odd.
2hb is better dps, if your comparing 1%er stuff abashi is going to outdps fon+gains.
If your comparing regular folk weapons,1h do not compare to a fist weaved ifs or even a peacebringer
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-17-2024, 09:53 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,878
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatChapp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
2hb is better dps, if your comparing 1%er stuff abashi is going to outdps fon+gains.
If your comparing regular folk weapons,1h do not compare to a fist weaved ifs or even a peacebringer
Thats not to say dw doesn’t work. It does and it works well. It is just 2h works far better. Such is the blessed nature of the monk.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-17-2024, 01:34 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As you can see, you don't need a 1h weapon with a delay of 12 to out DPS a TStaff.
Are you stupid or just careless in your reading comprehension? I’m hoping you’re just so excited to get to your rebuttal that your glaze over posts as you read them.

Either that or you are, sincerely, unintelligent.

What I actually said was that you need a mainhand DELAY of 11 on a level 60 to beat the DAMAGE BONUS potential of a mainhand DELAY of 30 for a 2 handed weapon.

Jesus Christ in a top hat …
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-17-2024, 01:49 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Are you stupid or just careless in your reading comprehension? I’m hoping you’re just so excited to get to your rebuttal that your glaze over posts as you read them.

Either that or you are, sincerely, unintelligent.

What I actually said was that you need a mainhand DELAY of 11 on a level 60 to beat the DAMAGE BONUS potential of a mainhand DELAY of 30 for a 2 handed weapon.

Jesus Christ in a top hat …
I read it fine. Your point about 11 delay weapons is irrelevant, and I showed why. You simply need to math out the DPS difference between weapons if you want the correct answer. It isn't more complex than that. As you say, the math isn't complicated.

You are just making yourself look foolish, like you always do. Hopefully one day you will realize trolling and insulting others simply hurts your credibity. It doesn't affect me at all.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.