Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Bugs > Velious Beta > Spells

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-25-2024, 05:24 PM
loramin loramin is offline
Planar Protector

loramin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,572
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p99portage [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Check out the other thread.

It was that long, we just got nuked by a single point of unreliable data.
So Nilbog has been building this place for a decade now. I think it's safe to say he's not biased towards any particular class ... or if he is, he's biased towards Enchanters [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He also has been compiling classic evidence for a decade, which means that he likely has access to more classic research than anyone (even including our classic researchers, like Dolalin or Rygar).

So which makes more sense? That Nilbog had access to evidence beyond what was mentioned in that thread, and he corrected the spell's duration accurately ... or that he "nuked" Enchanters based on "single point of unreliable data"?
__________________

Loramin Frostseer <Anonymous>, Hetch<Anonymous>, Tecla <Kingdom>, ...
Check out the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides

Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue or Green servers, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of platinum and/or gear! Send me a forum message for details.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2024, 07:22 PM
Vivitron Vivitron is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So Nilbog has been building this place for a decade now. I think it's safe to say he's not biased towards any particular class ... or if he is, he's biased towards Enchanters [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He also has been compiling classic evidence for a decade, which means that he likely has access to more classic research than anyone (even including our classic researchers, like Dolalin or Rygar).

So which makes more sense? That Nilbog had access to evidence beyond what was mentioned in that thread, and he corrected the spell's duration accurately ... or that he "nuked" Enchanters based on "single point of unreliable data"?
The most recent changelog now includes "Telin: Recorrected pacify to a classic era duration." And the thread has a 2019 Telin "Fixed, pending update." from when he fixed it from 42s to 7 min years ago.

So reading the tea leaves here I think Telin has been following that thread and updating Pacify's duration to match the balance of evidence there. IMO the post bivoac added after the recent patch thoroughly swings the balance of evidence back to 7 minutes, so maybe the latest change will be reverted.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-09-2024, 01:10 PM
Impact1983 Impact1983 is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivitron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The most recent changelog now includes "Telin: Recorrected pacify to a classic era duration." And the thread has a 2019 Telin "Fixed, pending update." from when he fixed it from 42s to 7 min years ago.

So reading the tea leaves here I think Telin has been following that thread and updating Pacify's duration to match the balance of evidence there. IMO the post bivoac added after the recent patch thoroughly swings the balance of evidence back to 7 minutes, so maybe the latest change will be reverted.
Should be a priority. Things like this hurt the already low server pop.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.