Best Trio That Doesn't Use Enchanter

[Troxx]

lol … this guy is a hoot

[plzrelax]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm convinced Rim has never had a char higher than 40.

Guy is either clueless or the best troll we've seen in a while.

Iirc he is the same person that tried to make serious arguments in favor of using the enchanter pet and throwing knives as a superior stategy to charming a few years back. Could be nothing but a master troll

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm convinced Rim has never had a char higher than 40.

Guy is either clueless or the best troll we've seen in a while.

You never grouped with an eyeball shaman that is also a monk?!

[Duik]

Someone seems to have an encyclopedic knowledge of anything that can be scraped from the interwebs.
Tom Brady. Pokemon. Bags in bags. Ranger tanks. Gameshark cheat codes.

What a guy.

[Duik]

I'll try to explain this in mathematics since you're focused more on the code than the results. lets' say it takes me 12% mana to heal a paladin or a ranger from half health to full health. If the med time it takes for me to regenerate that 12% mana is more than the health loss of said paladin/ranger, I will be playing a losing game trying to catch up mana and will eventually have to call to stop pulls. That's simple math.

That's alot of if and buts and a couple a coconuts. Your sentence forming algo is a bit awry. You come of as an adult in a room full of children.
Try to dial it back a bit to bot operator trying to pass of a badly developed bot as knowledgeable.
As an aside it seems to take many cues from the and only dsm.
Wise choice

[Zuranthium]

Originally Posted by Rimitto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I've seen paladins struggle heavily with aggro before, and when they finally do get it, they just bleed.

Paladins have the same base tanking ability as SK's, which you keep talking about as being such great tanks, and they have root + better heals on top of it.

Originally Posted by Rimitto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'll give you this question to think about....
Why do Monks always die on pulls but rangers never die on pulls?

This isn't a thing that happens. You don't seem to have any experience playing with a high level or well geared Monk.

[Penish]

lol this dude is on par with dsm

lol

[Vexenu]

Originally Posted by Rimitto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

they just bleed

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Knuckle]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No enchanters allowed because lets face it they're way too powerful.

I'll start:

Necro / Shaman / Monk

All iksar, start together at level 1, bigly RP lizardbros, can do well with low budget twinking or self-found, great off-meta Kunark leveling route.

There you go DSM, you finally got your Shaman in a "Best Group" hypothetical.

I imagine there is some content where maybe a warrior/cleric is superior. For those situations I would say Warrior/Cleric/Shaman for the slows/torpor/CH. I imagine that combo can tank the toughest content in the game short of major raids.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Knuckle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I imagine there is some content where maybe a warrior/cleric is superior. For those situations I would say Warrior/Cleric/Shaman for the slows/torpor/CH. I imagine that combo can tank the toughest content in the game short of major raids.

Shaman also adds huge dps with potions on content that needs ALL the heals, if we are assuming no economy/ entirely self found trio.

In self found there would be no enchanted jewelcraft (except maybe silver depending on timeline point). Assuming no silver fire wedding rings (2 30), etc what jewellery would the characters wear levelling up / peak?