Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[bcbrown]

Troxx in your re-read has anyone been receptive towards or in agreement with DSM's pocket thoughts?

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Troxx in your re-read has anyone been receptive towards or in agreement with DSM's pocket thoughts?

Towards pockets?

Not yet but I’m only on page 250.

Towards shamans being capable of doing any kind of dps remotely resembling mages?

No - none. Not one.

Page 251:

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lmao this is still so amazing. This guy freaked out at everyone about how Shaman does better DPS than Mage. Spent weeks going like "I provided data that Shaman does better DPS than Mage"

Then when Allyshia parsed and her Mage did better DPS, DSM changes the argument to "better DPS is meaningless" and is now pretending like he never argued that Shaman's DPS was better than mage

This is awesome to watch lmao

Originally Posted by Karanis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here's a brief summary of the past 250 pages:

Attachment 18760

Awww bless her heart:

Originally Posted by Allishia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I won the parse! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Troxx in your re-read has anyone been receptive towards or in agreement with DSM's pocket thoughts?

The arguments against pocket characters were based on a false claim that there was a rule stating pocket characters could not be used. Even Troxx has admitted there was no rule stating pocket characters could not be used. He made it up.

This invalidates the arguments against pocket characters.

It also shows people were willing to make stuff up to try and change the debate.