Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Looks like Troxx had a full-blown meltdown. 5 nonsense posts in a row.

The post history still exists, regardless of his nonsense. Troxx has simply added more evidence he is a troll, and has extreme delusions about this thread. He can't change the post history this way sadly. He was trying to walk back his admission of being a troll too. Trolling harder is not how you walk that back.

I asked Troxx if he could name a camp where a Cleric would be better than a Shaman at least 60 pages ago. He couldn't answer. In a different thread PatChapp could name Chardok Royals right off the bat. I have been waiting for Troxx to say "Chardok Royals" for 60+ pages now, but he couldn't do it.

He wonders why his credibility is in the trash. He dodges a question for 60+ pages via trolling, when it could be answered immediately if he knew as much about the game as he claims. Or he could have said he didn't know. There is nothing wrong with that. He just can't be wrong though. He hides in his safe space by trolling when he can't answer a question.

PatChapp also said he did Chardok Royals with a 52 Cleric. More evidence for using a pocket cleric!

Thank you Troxx for previously admitting there is no objective restriction on pocket characters in this thread. Troxx is simply interpreting the title subjectively. He fabricated the no pocket character restriction out of thin air. All of Troxx's arguments against pocket characters are invalid. He cannot use an imaginary rule as an argument.

It is sad that Troxx tries so hard, but can't make progress. Perhaps he should change tactics and address the topic for once. Clearly his current tactics are backfiring.

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I asked Troxx if he could name a camp where a Cleric would be better than a Shaman at least 60 pages ago. He couldn't answer. In a different thread PatChapp could name Chardok Royals right off the bat. I have been waiting for Troxx to say "Chardok Royals" for 60+ pages now, but he couldn't do it.

Originally Posted by PatChapp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The big lvl 60 cash camp that requires enchanters/cleric is chardok royals.

It sounds like we're in agreement now that there exist camps that need (as in require) clerics, while DSM has not been able to name any camp that needs (as in require) a shaman for this 4-man caster group.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It sounds like we're in agreement now that there exist camps that need (as in require) clerics, while DSM has not been able to name any camp that needs (as in require) a shaman for this 4-man caster group.

You forgot the second quote:

Originally Posted by PatChapp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The lowest we've used is 52 and mana was very tight. If queen has a shield 52cleric is really hairy

This camp can be done with a 52 cleric, which is a pocket cleric. I am glad we are in agreement that Chardok Royals does not need a level 60 main Cleric to do it. We are also in agreement that no objective rule exists in this thread preventing pocket characters from being used.

Vaniki is a camp already named where slowing would be difficult without a Shaman using Malo, and a single Cleric would run out of mana before the fight was over. This means the Cleric is getting support from the Shaman for healing and extending the time between CH.

Fungi King and West Waste Dragons are two camps where a Shaman is better than a Cleric.

This means you have 3 camps where you'd want a 60 Torpor Shaman thus far, and two camps for Cleric, at least one of which can be done with a pocket Cleric.

Chardok Royals were already discussed earlier in the thread. Troxx spent 70+ pages trolling and dodging instead of providing such an easy answer. I wonder why.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It sounds like we're in agreement now that there exist camps that need (as in require) clerics, while DSM has not been able to name any camp that needs (as in require) a shaman for this 4-man caster group.

Correct

BUT MUH POCKET CLERIC

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

At work. Will continue my read-through when I find the time. Currently page 307 and literally 98% of it so far is DSM arguing the same thing to the same people without saying new things