![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
Why are we using SK damage parses for our data?
Here is a "random" parse of a totally unrelated plate class with upper range gear in lots of slots. Does not compute. Talkin' apples and oranges or what? Now, I dunno the actual difference but imma suggest a 50 - 58 shm in good ec gear wiff a sprinkle of no drop goodies the higher you get would be splattered by a mob a 60 SK farms for uno cards. No science or parses to prove it. But ya know. Extra Pol Ation is three words that exist and mean something. NVM. Tell us more of your 60 SK as proof of xping a mid 50's shaman with a Jarlsberg Bone Bracer (of any race). Go. | ||
|
#2
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
I have actual parses from PoM Rat Maze. I removed dodge/parry/riposte from the equation and added a little more than 10% damage to boot. That changed 20 DPS parsed to 25 DPS predicted, which is a 25% increase in damage. That's a pretty big boost in damage. Troxx is going to need to provide evidence that a level 58 Shaman is going to take at least 50% more damage than my 59 SK at the time in PoM Rat Maze to shift the 10 DPS number I provided here https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=523 to a higher number. Quote:
If you want to claim I am doing the normal distribution wrong, please show us your math for a normal distribution of procced DoT damage. My math is here, and it already takes into account the different points at which the DoT could trigger in a fight: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=646 Quote:
Quote:
208 damage = proccing at 12 seconds (40 + 7 ticks of 24 damage), 184 = proccing at 24 seconds (40 + 5 ticks of 24 damage), etc.
__________________
| ||||||
|
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 01-31-2024 at 11:08 AM..
| |||||||
![]() |
|
|