![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you think Regen is quantifiably better than FSI at level 60 with Torpor, you need to bring facts and evidence to support it. This is a factual discussion, not a player preference discussion. One racial is better than the other, regardless of your preference.
__________________
| |||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
I am not sure why people want to hurt others by providing bad information and trolling.
__________________
| |||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
If it was easy to prove Regeneration was better than FSI, people would have posted mountains of counter evidence by now to shut me up. I would love for that to happen honestly. You could post evidence to instead of nonsense like this, but you choose not to. I wonder why. Thus far I have provided plenty of logic, facts, and evidence to support my claim, and counter the points people generally make. The same cannot be said for people who claim Regeneration is better than FSI. Yet for some reason they feel like they can claim victory for no logical reason. It is baffling.
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 01-19-2024 at 01:17 AM..
| ||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
I actually deleted my post thinking if we can’t agree to what words mean it’s a pointless pursuit. Good luck actually quantifying this someday.
| ||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thus far, I have shown plenty of logic, evidence, and facts to show why FSI is better than Regen on a Shaman at level 60 with Torpor. The opposition has not, and refuses to do so. I am honestly not sure why. If it is so obvious, it should be trivial to do. It seems like they are not as confident as they claim to be. I agree with you that people trolling and posting "I am right, you are wrong" style posts are engaged in a pointless pursuit. They will not convince anybody that they are correct. It just makes them look bad.
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 01-19-2024 at 01:30 AM..
| ||||
![]() |
|
|