Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Gloomlord]

Yep, this account is made to troll alright!

Conveniently ignore I have a 59 Bard, 57 Paladin and a 54 Necromancer. This account was made exclusively to troll!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yep, this account is made to troll alright!

Conveniently ignore I have a 59 Bard, 57 Paladin and a 54 Necromancer. This account was made exclusively to troll!

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=241

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're the only one I'm "harassing", you manipulative sociopath.

You admitted it, and the evidence is over 80% of your entire post history is just insulting and trolling. Anybody can check your post history, they don't need to take my word for it.

What characters you play in game is honestly irrelevant to your actions here.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My account was not exclusively made to troll.

400/412 nonsensical posts in this thread exclusively says otherwise. You cannot hide your post history.

Unfortunately for you, your trolling was just too obvious. It is why most posters ignored the vast majority of your posts, even other trolls. I am just replying to you in this instance so people get context for your account. You will probably reply in this thread again, but there isn't much point in engaging with you further. You will continue to post the same nonsense over and over. It is the pattern which everybody can see if they check the history of this thread.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is there any particular group size & content combination which you WOULDN'T include Shaman among the "best" classes and therefore choose Shaman as one of the classes for that group/content?

Sure. Any fight where the mob cannot be slowed is generally not a very good fight for a Shaman. Xenovorash comes to mind just off the top of my head.

Sometimes groups will still take a Shaman in these cases because Torpor is a cheap and good spot heal, and spot heals are good to mitigate potential gaps in a CH chain. The Shaman can Cannibalize too, so they can cast more spot heals while Torpor is ticking.

For single group content without a Warrior (which is what this thread is about), very few mobs that people want to kill are immune to slow, or deal enough damage to outpace Torpor. That is why Shaman is a top pick in this thread. The content fits well with a Shaman's strengths.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

400/412 nonsensical posts in this thread exclusively says otherwise. You cannot hide your post history.

Unfortunately for you, your trolling was just too obvious. It is why most posters ignored the vast majority of your posts, even other trolls. I am just replying to you in this instance so people get context for your account.

Would you be willing to provide the definitions of "nonsensical" and "trolling" that you are ascribing to my posts in this thread, for the sake of civil discussion? To my knowledge, I have not indicated that I am interested in hiding my post history, which I am fully aware is not able to be hidden - so I am not sure why your post would seem to indicate that you believe I would be interested in doing and/or that I am attempting to do anything of the sort (strawman much?). Regarding whether others have "ignored" the vast majority of my posts: others already replied to inform you (specifically) that they were not ignoring me, my posts were simply largely directed solely at yourself. I have interacted with others, and I/my posts have been the subject of other posters' replies. This is all clear and visible in the clearly visible post history.

The objective fact of the matter is: I could simply claim that your thousands of posts in this thread are "nonsensical" and (obvious) "trolling" and we would simply be at an impasse. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]