|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Overall, how pleased are you with the project? | |||
| 1 |
   
|
1 | 0.33% |
| 2 |
  
|
1 | 0.33% |
| 3 |
  
|
1 | 0.33% |
| 4 |
  
|
2 | 0.66% |
| 5 |
  
|
3 | 0.99% |
| 6 |
  
|
7 | 2.31% |
| 7 |
|
15 | 4.95% |
| 8 |
|
62 | 20.46% |
| 9 |
|
81 | 26.73% |
| 10 |
|
130 | 42.90% |
| Voters: 303. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#34
03-31-2010, 04:22 PM
|
|||
|
7 because too many non classic things from live EQ included and too many improvements tossed out to make it visually classic. I'm after the game play of classic and it is sort of here. But having a teraflop capable video card with graphics that didn't really send me 11 years ago seems a tad bit like wanting to go to the park you loved but in a horse and buggy when you could drive...
Inclusion of hell levels? Right on I love it was always a right of passage. Inclusion of classic icons that are the same for far too many spells? Would find it far preferable if that was optional. I can't really pour through 8000 plus lines of code to find where that is coded thus making it all but impossible to use better,more detailed icons. Seems like these choices are more about recapturing high school/college days of youth(as majority of people I've talked to are in that 30 something range)then enjoying the game play of classic EQ? I was in my 40's when the game game out. Just 11 years back to me ~shrug~. My 2 cps which is probably what all this typing was worth =)
__________________
If you make friends with yourself you will never be alone.
Maxwell Maltz | ||
|
Last edited by Arksa_Apocrypha; 03-31-2010 at 08:36 PM..
Reason: SC
|
|
||
|
|
Threaded Mode