ELON MUSK vs. MARK ZUCKERBERG CAGE MATCH

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, it is not because of bullshit that the right makes up to ram through their hateful censorship crap.

You're better than these clowns. Stop it.

If you mean the school gay thing, it also restricts straight white college educated women. Which I'm highly in favor of.

[Origen]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you mean the school gay thing, it also restricts straight white college educated women. Which I'm highly in favor of.

Public school textbooks in Florida can't indicate the existence of white college educated women?

I suppose it could track. Educated women do generally despise reactionary politics, as they are inherently anti-female. Florida probably has the highest per capita population of incels, such as a certain fascist on this very forum.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Public school textbooks in Florida can't indicate the existence of white college educated women?

I suppose it could track. Educated women do generally despise reactionary politics, as they are inherently anti-female. Florida probably has the highest per capita population of incels, such as a certain fascist on this very forum.

Curriculum is naturally exclusionary. You could equally complain that astrophysics and alchemy are not in the K-3 programming and be just as right.

[Origen]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Curriculum is naturally exclusionary. You could equally complain that astrophysics and alchemy are not in the K-3 programming and be just as right.

Kind of a neutral argument to make, I am not claiming one is more "advanced" than the other. I am claiming that it's censorship, because "Hate Speech" Homeateaded is too dense to perceive his hypocrisy. Why include heterosexual people, but exclude homosexual people?

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Kind of a neutral argument to make, I am not claiming one is more "advanced" than the other. I am claiming that it's censorship, because "Hate Speech" Homeateaded is too dense to perceive his hypocrisy. Why include heterosexual people, but exclude homosexual people?

I think you're using a novel meaning of existence and am becoming confused.

[Origen]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think you're using a novel meaning of existence and am becoming confused.

Maybe it was the wrong word. Gay and trans people definitely exist, and always will, despite the efforts of reactionary conservatives. Their efforts to censor them out of the minds of kids will probably have the opposite outcome. Many civilizations did way worse historically and they still yet exist, not that it makes censorship good.

I suspect their culture war bullshit is them overplaying their hand, but I probably won't live long enough to enjoy the vindication of being correct on this one.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Maybe it was the wrong word. Gay and trans people definitely exist, and always will, despite the efforts of reactionary conservatives. Their efforts to censor them out of the minds of kids will probably have the opposite outcome. Many civilizations did way worse historically and they still yet exist, not that it makes censorship good.

I suspect their culture war bullshit is them overplaying their hand, but I probably won't live long enough to enjoy the vindication of being correct on this one.

Let's put a pin in that and circle back to hollering at Seducio. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

which is what happens if you are near the liberal middle with the capacity for empathy who wants to maximize the usefulness of Govt to 80% or 90% of people instead of the special interests, anti-bipartisanship, and extreme elites on both sides.

What is special interests? Almost everyone says it's bad but I can't discern what it means.