sk starting points

[Troxx]

Total posts on thread: 595
Total posts from DSM in thread: 212
# of people DSM has convinced: 0
# of people who disagree with DSM: unilateral consensus of active participants


Yikes.


Can we let this die now?

We are more or less unanimously in agreement and at an impasse convincing DSM of anything

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Total posts on thread: 595
Total posts from DSM in thread: 212
# of people DSM has convinced: 0
# of people who disagree with DSM: unilateral consensus of active participants


Yikes.


Can we let this die now?

We are more or less unanimously in agreement and at an impasse convincing DSM of anything

We can let it die at any time. You do not speak for everybody. It is silly to simply claim victory, when you cannot even provide evidence for your claims. Two posters agreed with me regarding INT on page 1 of this thread, using my same argument. Your trolling is trivial to expose.

People can compare your opinions to my actual evidence and make their own conclusions. You do not have to keep trolling due to a fear of being wrong.

Getting the correct information to the user is the important part, not who is right or wrong.

People can look at the evidence so far that INT is the best starting stat in the posts below:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=300

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=507

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=513

I encourage people to gather counter-evidence if they feel there is something I am missing.

Originally Posted by Croco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you actually believe this you would never post on these forums ever again.

Your bias is clearly showing. Your opinion of me is irrelevant. If you think I am wrong, prove it! You do not simply get to say "I am right and you are wrong because some other posters agree with me". That is an argumentum ad populum fallacy.

[Vexenu]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

People can look at the evidence so far that INT is the best starting stat in the posts below:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=300

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=507

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=513

There is NOTHING in any of these posts that makes an actual argument that INT provides an advantage. Your entire argument is that "STR is not really that useful", even though its advantages can be MATHEMATICALLY DEMONSTRATED. In contrast, you cannot even demonstrate a single reasonably plausible scenario in which a well-played SK will benefit from extra INT (you merely offer the vague suggestion that extra mana it may allow for a life-saving FD), much less provide mathematical evidence of the sort that can be furnished in support of STR.

To reiterate:

Originally Posted by Vexenu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

DSM has yet to articulate a compelling argument or provide any actual evidence for his contention that the added mana from 20 INT confers a meaningful advantage for an Iksar SK. His only points are literally, "You should pump INT because it's harder to cap" and "It could theoretically give you enough extra mana to FD and save your life one day". But neither of these statements are logical arguments for pumping INT over STR:

1) CHA is the hardest stat for an SK to cap, so why not pump it? The answer is obvious: because it doesn't confer enough of an advantage to do so. The same logic applies to INT in this case.

2) Pumping INT just because you might one day get off an extra FD from it makes no sense. Theoretically, a lot of things might happen in EQ. Theoretically, extra STR might also make the narrow difference between life and death in some bizarre, highly improbable scenario. Or extra DEX might give you an Epic proc that saves your life. Or extra STA might give you just enough buffer not to die before a CH lands. Because of this, a theoretical argument for INT is no more valid than a theoretical argument for any other stat, most especially STR.

Why? Because STR is the only stat that provides IRREFUTABLE AND CONCRETE benefits both IN and OUT of combat, as has been exhaustively demonstrated in this thread. Whether the precise value is 4 or 5% added DPS is irrelevant, as is how many extra kills this might generate per hour in your tortured examples. The point is that this benefit exists. It is real. You cannot handwave it away. It is a real benefit that can be objectively proven. Added carry weight is also a real, concrete benefit. There is no argument against it. Carrying more weight provides meaningful value. Everyone who has played EQ understands this intuitively.

In contrast, there remains no way to demonstrate any sort of conclusive value from the extra mana provided by INT. SKs do not EVER dump their mana 100-0 in the way that a Wizard, Druid or Cleric regularly does, or the way that another caster might occasionally have need to do. Good SKs spend most of their active playtime hovering between 25% and 75% mana. They leave enough reserve in the tank to account for any emergencies, while ensuring that they don't waste any mana regen by sitting around at full mana. Because of this, adding extra mana on top of their mana pool provides little in the way of value to begin with, and whatever value it does provide simply cannot be accounted for accurately. It's like if your car holds holds enough gasoline to drive 500 miles without filling up, but you never drive more than 50 miles at a time. In this case, expanding your gas tank makes NO SENSE and provides you zero value. And that goes exactly the same for expanding the SK's mana pool by pumping INT in this scenario.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Vexenu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There is NOTHING in any of these posts that makes an actual argument that INT provides an advantage. Your entire argument is that "STR is not really that useful", even though its advantages can be MATHEMATICALLY DEMONSTRATED. In contrast, you cannot even demonstrate a single reasonably plausible scenario in which a well-played SK will benefit from extra INT (you merely offer the vague suggestion that extra mana it may allow for a life-saving FD), much less provide mathematical evidence of the sort that can be furnished in support of STR.

To reiterate:

Throwing a tantrum and dismissing counter evidence (the actual definiton of goalpost moving) is not convincing anyone. Nor is simply proclaming your opinions are superior.

You have yet to provide any math of any kind to show the mathematical superiority you speak of when it comes to STR.

[Vexenu]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Throwing a tantrum and dismissing counter evidence (the actual definiton of goalpost moving) is not convincing anyone. Nor is simply proclaming your opinions are superior.

I want you to quote yourself from those threads and paste excerpts where you actually demonstrate an argument IN FAVOR OF INT. You have never been able to do this. You have just been trying to minimize the importance of STR. You have no actual argument in favor of INT. Saying that "STR is overrated" is not the same thing as saying "Here is the evidence that INT is the stat worth pumping instead of any other."

And reminder: Saying that INT should be pumped just because it is harder to cap than STR is NOT an argument. You have to actually demonstrate the value of the added INT, otherwise we might as well be pumping CHA.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have yet to provide any math of any kind to show the mathematical superiority you speak of when it comes to STR.

Troxx and others have conclusively demonstrated the 4-5% DPS increase. Increased carry weight is self-evidently proven.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Vexenu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There is NOTHING in any of these posts that makes an actual argument that INT provides an advantage. Your entire argument is that "STR is not really that useful", even though its advantages can be MATHEMATICALLY DEMONSTRATED. In contrast, you cannot even demonstrate a single reasonably plausible scenario in which a well-played SK will benefit from extra INT (you merely offer the vague suggestion that extra mana it may allow for a life-saving FD), much less provide mathematical evidence of the sort that can be furnished in support of STR.

Bingo!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Two posters agreed with me regarding INT on page 1 of this thread,

Before any discussion took place.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Before any discussion took place.

Thanks for admitting your troll failed. It is quite a common occurence. You can't even bother to read the thread.