Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-27-2023, 01:10 PM
Gloomlord Gloomlord is offline
Fire Giant

Gloomlord's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 683
Default

Suppose you should also be agreeing with the fact that mages might be better at one thing than the shaman, but alas, here we are.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-27-2023, 01:18 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is online now
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Suppose you should also be agreeing with the fact that mages might be better at one thing than the shaman, but alas, here we are.
I agree with you that Mages do better single target DPS when compared to a Shaman.

I simply disagree that roughly 50 extra single target DPS over a Shaman is necessary in a four man group already doing 200+ DPS with 2 Enchanters.

The Shaman's utility far outweighs DPS that has already hit significant diminishing returns, and the group can have the Shaman do more DPS via root rotting in XP groups if they care. As other people have mentioned (and I agree), that is typically overkill because players intuitively understand diminishing returns on DPS. It is the same reason why you don't normally see 6 player XP groups, because the additional DPS of 2-3 more players simply doesn't make up for the XP loss each player is getting.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 06-27-2023 at 01:22 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-27-2023, 01:44 PM
Gloomlord Gloomlord is offline
Fire Giant

Gloomlord's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I agree with you that Mages do better single target DPS when compared to a Shaman.

I simply disagree that roughly 50 extra single target DPS over a Shaman is necessary in a four man group already doing 200+ DPS with 2 Enchanters.

The Shaman's utility far outweighs DPS that has already hit significant diminishing returns, and the group can have the Shaman do more DPS via root rotting in XP groups if they care. As other people have mentioned (and I agree), that is typically overkill because players intuitively understand diminishing returns on DPS. It is the same reason why you don't normally see 6 player XP groups, because the additional DPS of 2-3 more players simply doesn't make up for the XP loss each player is getting.
The thing is: most would prefer a bit of extra DPS on a single target in a charm group than redundant utility and utterly worthless root rotting that you only brought up to childishly spite mage.

If I wanted utility here in this group, I'd take a Necromancer or a Druid.

We've already covered this over multiple pages last year.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-27-2023, 01:51 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is online now
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The thing is: most would prefer a bit of extra DPS on a single target in a charm group than redundant utility and utterly worthless root rotting that you only brought up to childishly spite mage.

If I wanted utility here in this group, I'd take a Necromancer or a Druid.

We've already covered this over multiple pages last year.
I didn't do anything to "spite Mages". That is a fabrication on your part. It is not my fault Mages are not very strong on P99, nor did I advocate to nerf them. This is the inherit problem with a time locked box, some classes get screwed more than others.

I am simply pointing out that Mage DPS is redundant in a group with high DPS, and a Shaman can increase their DPS in XP groups if necessary.

Shaman/Enchanter/Necro/Whatever is a great four man group, so I agree bringing a Necromancer is a good option, and you could even do Shaman/Enchanter/Necro/Druid. With the Shaman, Enchanter, and Necro pets the group is hitting close to 200 DPS, and you can easily get over that with Shaman/Necro/Druid spells.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Then why can't the other enchanter take over? You're telling me two enchanters can't make a decision on how to split their mana on which tasks?

Think, DSM, think!
Both Enchanters are still using a lot of mana on CCing and Charming. You aren't going to have only one Enchanter charming. If your Enchanters are at FM, I am not sure why you think the group is doing content challenging enough to need Cleric heals to begin with.

The only lack of thinking here is assuming you need maximum efficiency heals, while also claiming the Enchanters are never going to have mana problems.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 06-27-2023 at 01:53 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.