Hunter: Dad, why didn't I get 2-3 years in Jail for felony gun possession?

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Kinda grasping at straws verse the direct wrong doing of the previous administrations.
(Heh, a Conservative against the right to bear arms. What next?)

In Washington DC -
If a person is charged with possession of an unregistered firearm, they could face a maximum penalty of one year in jail and a maximum possible fine of $2,500 or both.

In DC, there is no mandatory minimum penalties for unlawful possession of ammunition, possession of an unregistered firearm, and carrying a pistol without a license.

I believe the case was filed in DE and in that case...

If in Delaware typically, 71% of gun charges are dropped

Sorry the law didn't throw the book at him and give him the maximum.

It's a federal charge; possessing a firearm while using drugs.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's a federal charge; possessing a firearm while using drugs.

Oh ya I saw this. Person posting it has since been arrested by FBI

LOL JK. Not yet

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh ya I saw this. Person posting it has since been arrested by FBI

LOL JK. Not yet

Do you think it's a good law?

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you think it's a good law?

I think, and I have said many many times, I am 100% for going after people’s guns, up to and including, “gun grabbing”, from career criminal felons who have no legal right to have them, and who happen to commit most of the gun violence in America

But police go like this when you ask them to get the guns out of the hands of the dangerous felons…why?

Because they don’t want to die trying

And that’s fine, I guess they’ll keep their guns they shouldn’t legally have, and keep shooting people on the daily during their mugging and maybe just because the person looked at them weird or dissed them online or was on the wrong “turf” repping the wrong set, whateva

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think, and I have said many many times, I am 100% for going after people’s guns, up to and including, “gun grabbing”, from career criminal felons who have no legal right to have them, and who happen to commit most of the gun violence in America

But police go like this when you ask them to get the guns out of the hands of the dangerous felons…why?

Because they don’t want to die trying

And that’s fine, I guess they’ll keep their guns they shouldn’t legally have, and keep shooting people on the daily during their mugging and maybe just because the person looked at them weird or dissed them online or was on the wrong “turf” repping the wrong set, whateva

Tengo mota? It's still an illegal drug federally.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tengo mota? It's still an illegal drug federally.

Oh you mean the gun with narcotics rule?

For weed? That’s silly, but I don’t even know how it works. I knew for years when I got my weed card never to have both weed and a gun in a vehicle at the same time though

I’m assuming maybe the concern was that for some people, especially people with a psychotic DO dx, that weed use can sometimes cause psychosis. Or even for neurotypical people, enough weed used by a complete weed newbie could create erratic and unpredictable behavior. My aunt supposedly after eating some edibles laid on her bathroom floor terrified for 2 days, which I will always tell them is ridiculous and that I don’t believe it, but she still says it’s true

But otherwise the no weed rule seems silly to me, other harder stuff esp more psychoactive stuff like meth, absolutely not