![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
what are we supposed to take away from that mess
| ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
In the context of Plato's Theory of Forms, he insists there is a realm higher than this one where perfect ideals exist that the mind conceptualizes when we think of a thing. These idealized forms are eternal, and unchanging, and exist in a system of interdependencies and relations to each other.
Plato goes on to state that through dialectical inquiry we can come to understand the interdependencies and relations between these forms, which exist in a hierarchy of relations to each other, and the insights we gain from this understanding is the key to all knowledge. He insinuates that the mind serves as an antennae for these thoughtforms, which we can only imperfectly actualize in the lower realm of 4-dimensional "reality" we live in. For example, consider "Love". The mind intuitively knows what Love is "supposed" to be, but all attempts at reifying Love in this lower plane results in an imperfect approximation, or a perversion of the perfect love we intuitively conceptualize and strive towards in our relationships with others, be that familial, romantic, or "platonic" (which is a revealing term in and of itself but we can talk about that some other time) Originally, Plato only conceived of these forms as "positive" perfections, things like the Form of Truth, the Form of Beauty, the form of Virtue, with the highest form being the form of "The Good" but he was shortsighted in this approach so he didn't communicate the concept very effectively, especially in the context of language that has passed through 2500+ years of linguistic evolutions. Now, with that said, consider the concept of Dualism. In the perspective of Dualism everything that exists has a conjugate, an anima to the Animus, a yin to the yang So if Wisdom is a Form then it must, necessarily have a conjugate inverse. Consider Pride, as a negative conceptual trait. What is "Pride" exactly? In order to come to any sort of agreement or understanding of what "Pride" is we have to understand how it is exemplified in a person we esteem as "Prideful" and what projectionary markers that "prideful" person projects onto others to signal to us that he is a "Prideful" individual despite the fact that we can easily identify a person who is prideful almost intuitively. How is pride exemplified? Most people would agree pride in a prideful person is exemplified in Arrogance, or Ignorance, and if you carefully observe several prideful persons you will see they tend to project certain characteristic traits onto others signalling to us they are prideful. The projections are generally projected in the form of the conjugate of their exemplifications Arrogance, an air of (unfounded or unjustified) superiority is projected as weakness onto others who he sees as below him. Because he is prideful he projects weakness or lesser-ness onto others. Ignorance, a refusal to acknowledge truth is projected as it's conjugate; "Knowledge" which he pridefully "lords" others which also serves to reinforce his arrogance, likewise his arrogance projected as weakness over others is used to boost his feelings of being in possession of knowledge that makes him, in his mind, "better", 'or "stronger" than you. So these forms of "Arrogance" "Ignorance" "Weakness" and "Knowledge" Orbit around Pride in the platonic realm of Mind. So, the mind, being a sort of inversing mirror of meaning-making puts Pride in the "crosshairs" "between" these four forms which orbit it on two axes with arrogance opposite weakness and ignorance opposite knowledge with pride at the "origin" of the quadratic (axiomatic) graph that two axis' meeting at a right angle insinuates. Arrogance---------\|/--------Knowledge ---------------------Pride------------------- Ignorance---------/|\---------Weakness So we can imagine this "Axiom" exists like a pyramidal structure with pride at the apex and the four sub-forms orbiting it constituting the four corners of its base. So what is the "opposite" of Pride? | ||
|
Last edited by Landroval; 04-26-2023 at 12:54 AM..
| |||
|
#3
|
|||
|
totally didn't sign up for this class
where is metal shop? i just wanna play with forges and welders before free period | ||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#5
|
|||
|
how about some remedial training
happy + sad = frog? | ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
----------------- (Nous) ----------------
--------------(knowledge)---------------- Pride--------------▼------------Wisdom Weakness-----Truth----------Strength Shame------------▲------------Humility Luciferian<---(Christ)--->MiChaElian --------------- (Ennoia) ----------------- Now, this is a complete axiomatic syzygy, and it can be "proofed" to determine is is accurately mapped. If you look at the picture I posted of what I drew on a whiteboard for the girls, you notice every Form, on the opposite side of the construct is a conjugate of it's other side; Success is the opposite of failure (sin) Arrogance is the opposite of patience Ignorance is the opposite of awareness, knowledge is the opposite of humiliation, courage is the opposite of vulnerability, strength is the opposite of weakness, etc. Now we get to the more mathematically complex aspects of it; Let pride = sin(x) and because humility is the "inverse" of pride, humility = csc(x) Let shame = cos(x) and it's inverse; wisdom = sec(x) Trigonometric Identity Property: 1^2 = sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) Or 1^2 = sin(x)/csc(x) + cos(x)/sec(x) Or 1^2 = csc^2(x) + sec^2(x) And then we apply our let statements Truth = pride^2 + shame^2 In mathematics the terms "of" "and" and "is" are mathematical operators representing * or /, +, and = respectively So let's say this is words "Truth is the pride of pride and the shame of shame" Or if we do equational repivot #2 Truth is the pride of humility and the shame of wisdom Or the inverses: Truth is the humility of pride and the wisdom of shame Truth is the humbling of our pride and the wisdom our shame hides from So we can trigonometrically "proof" the axioms. And ALL axiomatic syzygies have identical transferrence function So, if we properly map the forms without making a conceptual error we can apply the exact same mathematical principles to ALL axiomatic syzygies;. And it turns out THIS IS EXACTLY HOW the physics of energy transfer works in this universe we call reality. ------------------------- (Photon) ---------------- Electromagnetism -----▼--------------- Heat (Electron) ------------ Energy ----- (Phonon) Gravity --------------------▲------------ Sound ------------------------ (Graviton) ---------------- | ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
And furthermore we can conceptually "proof" the axiom as well:
Truth exists in between pride and humility, Fake humility (untruthful humility) IS pride, the only thing that psychologically differentiates them IS truth. Likewise True Pride IS humble. The same thing applies with shame and wisdom. If we stop hiding from the truth of our shame it allows us to learn from it which becomes wisdom and if we fake wisdom we are hiding our shame. Then we can go back to the sublevels of each of those forms too Pride is what differentiates ignorance from knowledge, and pride is what differentiates arrogance from weakness etc. | ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
This is what Philosophy is; not this postmodern bullshit parading itself as philosophy nowadays
Philo means "the love of" Sophy is a Greek root of "Sophia" the goddess of wisdom (aka the Holy Spirit) Philosophy is the practice of exploring wisdom, as an idealized platonic form. The reason why the Greeks built statues that they believed possessed the essence of their Gods is because if you connect three platonic forms it forms an angle, and this angle is a facet of the Godhead in the divine realm of forms which consists of all forms, and their Gods were assigned these characteristics, anthropomorphized and "Concretized" (quite literally) into a statue which served as a "Concretized form". These angles, in the Christian mythos became ANGELS and, Michael, for example is the angle you form when you connect wisdom strength and humility together which is also the crux of Pythagoreanism. This is also the "humanities" portion of my daughters homeschool curriculum which was approved in full as transferrable credits when I laid out a presentation of it for her principal and district superintendent; needless to say they were fucking floored and absolutely dumbstruck. The principal offered me a job as their interdisciplinary curriculum instructor on my way out if I could get credentialed to teach in California. | ||
|
Last edited by Landroval; 04-26-2023 at 01:52 AM..
| |||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
I fixed a lifetime of common core retardation in 1 year. They're technically ready to be in college now. They meet all the requisites to enter into a stem major and start taking 101 courses. One of them is in 8th grade and college-ready for a STEM major. I taught a 12 year old girl algebra, geometry, algebra 2, and trig, in one year. | |||
|
Last edited by Landroval; 04-26-2023 at 11:07 AM..
| ||||
![]() |
|
|