![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
My warrior is level 23 and I am dual wielding:
Main hand: silvery war axe Off hand: minataur axe | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
I would not base any conclusions on pet taunts, versus character taunts.
Pets in Project 99 are superpets, and do not seem at all in line with what they would have been in early classic, at least. Pet taunt, in particular, is much overdone. I have not noticed any problems in groups with warrior taunt, specifically. Melee taunting seems to work, or at least it generally keeps hate away from our healers and casters. Players in our groups do not usually overdo things, however, to generate massive hate. I wonder if some players are expecting their melee characters to behave as they did after taunt and hate changes had been introduced with the PoP expansion. After PoP, it was pretty hard for casters to pull hate off a taunting tank unless they seriously tried to do so. In classic, it was different. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Sorry.. I'm going to nit-pick this. Not trying to hijack! <3
Quote:
<3 | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
The only people who know for sure are the ones who work on the actual source. Other then that, we are all pretty oblivious to the current state in which taunt is in for any class/pet. | |||
|
Last edited by Nagrak; 10-20-2009 at 07:45 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Taunt works, and it's chance to succeed goes up as your taunt skill does. There's one kicker, and it's that it only works on blues. Evens/yellows/reds are immune. What i'd like to see fixed is the taunt message only going off on a successful taunt.
For warrior agro, I only suggest picking up proc weapons. Obsidian shards work best for this, and begin procing at level 16. Until then, you're pretty much a rogue. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Taunt IS changed in P1999, its actually changed to be exactly like it is on live, which has worked the same way since classic. Taunt is only used as a means to get to the top of the hate list. If your at the top, it generates no additional aggro. This is how it is on P1999. EQEmu SVN (PEQ is not a god damn source code, its a database, stop referring to "the PEQ Source") is wrong.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|