The insurrection hoax is over

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Basanos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That pesky liberal bias of "real life" is a hell of a thing, isn't it?

Have you tried not having beliefs that permit fascism to prosper?

No it's more like the complete absence of journalistic integrity that any 9th grader learns in social studies.

The article on george floyd literally opens by referring to him as a man who was "murdered". There is no representation of the counter argument, which is, ya know, the fact that there's absolutely zero evidence that derek chauvin intended to kill him. Which is, ya know, the definition of murder.

Pesky details like what words actually mean are apparently a major obstacle for wikipedia.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No it's more like the complete absence of journalistic integrity that any 9th grader learns in social studies.

The article on george floyd literally opens by referring to him as a man who was "murdered". There is no representation of the counter argument, which is, ya know, the fact that there's absolutely zero evidence that derek chauvin intended to kill him. Which is, ya know, the definition of murder.

Pesky details like what words actually mean are apparently a major obstacle for wikipedia.

It's murder because the court said it's murder. Rule of law, not rule of men.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's murder because the court said it's murder. Rule of law, not rule of men.

No shit I was referring to wikipedia's total lack of doing what they purport to do. I wasn't opining on the verdict itself but I know you already know that cause you're an obtuse buffoon.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No shit I was referring to wikipedia's total lack of doing what they purport to do. I wasn't opining on the verdict itself but I know you already know that cause you're an obtuse buffoon.

Pick a better thing to complain about than a fact.

[Basanos]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No it's more like the complete absence of journalistic integrity that any 9th grader learns in social studies.

The article on george floyd literally opens by referring to him as a man who was "murdered". There is no representation of the counter argument, which is, ya know, the fact that there's absolutely zero evidence that derek chauvin intended to kill him. Which is, ya know, the definition of murder.

Pesky details like what words actually mean are apparently a major obstacle for wikipedia.

Journalistic integrity is expected in Wikipedia?

Hell I barely went to pretend college and even I know it's not an acceptable source for anything in academics

You may as well whine about the "liberal bias" of reddit dot com