TEH RECKONING!!

[XiakenjaTZ]

I may go Wizard this time. Playing a bard was a bit too much work and I never want to do the mage epic again or camp a tranquil staff again so that would rule out those 2 classes.

Only downside of a wizard would be on a single box server you could never camp any items solo. Unless you are after something well below your range...

Xiak

[Arillious]

Originally Posted by XiakenjaTZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I may go Wizard this time. Playing a bard was a bit too much work and I never want to do the mage epic again or camp a tranquil staff again so that would rule out those 2 classes.

Only downside of a wizard would be on a single box server you could never camp any items solo. Unless you are after something well below your range...

Xiak

Wizards were great in pvp and group pve. They were never intended to be major solo classes. Remember that porting is a huge advantage on a pvp server.

[solid]

... It's shit like this, VZ and TZ, that makes everyone mock how blue your servers were.

You absolutely could manaburn people. 60 Wizards had Manaburn (instant kill) and instant Nexus gate, along with everything else. They were fucking scary.

Necros had LB which was essentially another 1shot kill, and SK's had DT.

If you could go back in time to replay everquest from its inception, you go: Druid til Luclin, Wizard until pop, Bard afterwords. Anything else and you're doing it wrong.

[Kope]

Originally Posted by solid [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

... It's shit like this, VZ and TZ, that makes everyone mock how blue your servers were.

Did your mom not love you or something Mr. Troll?