![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Shadowknight or Warrior as your group tank? | |||
| Shadowknight |
|
36 | 54.55% |
| Warrior |
|
30 | 45.45% |
| Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
definitly warrior..
SKs are nice and they have it easier holding aggro, but they cant tank aswell as warriors, even with their leeching! a healers manapool always like warriors more [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
[50 Warrior] Rumzuck Umbatsch (Ogre) <Remedy> [34 Druid] Vito Corleone (Wood Elf) <Europa> [35 Necromancer] Torak (Dark Elf) <Europa> [13 Shadow Knight] Rumzerg (Dark Elf) <Europa> EQEmuLauncher Have your files up to date, switch between servers nice and easy, and more! http://moestaverne.com/ | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
But ask that to the 26 Cleric in SolA that is healing the Warrior, Rogue, Bard, Shaman and Druid in the group, because the Warrior doesn't have Yak's yet to keep aggro. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Obsidian Shards work pretty well. Until my early 20s I used 2 non proccing weapons. Did I lose aggro? Yes, every once in a while, but with smart group members that didn't go nuts, immediatly, even my non proccing weapons did pretty well.
__________________
Krone - Troll Warrior
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
I chose to play a Warrior because of the exp bonus sks exp penalty, that is probably the number 1 short term reason.
The big long term reason is that warriors are great in Kunark. I also like the ability to use a big 2 hander or dual wield. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Dual SBD's for life baby.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|