Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 09-17-2022, 04:30 PM
cyxthryth cyxthryth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatChapp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I lvld my enchanter a lot of 56-60 with a necro duo.
He would pull and park with paralyzing, while my charm pet killed one at a time. Swap new pet every 4or 5 merbs, root parking is very adequate cc. Very high kill rate,very safe until casters get in the mix. With casters we just tried to park them around corners or prioritized them on the kill list.
Root parking is strong cc,and frees up the enchanter for enchanter things.
"Very safe" =/= "No risk" this really isn't hard hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yup. It is a perfectly valid strategy for anybody who doesn't have some strange obsession against it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you were to attempt to utilize the fact that another particular/specific poster seemed to agree with you on one or more particular points to attempt to claim, state, or otherwise imply/reveal/betray/expose (intentionally or otherwise) that you believe that could, would, or did somehow strengthen your argument, that would simply be an example of you claiming your argument is strengthened due to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum - like you previously (intentionally or otherwise) attempted to claim by attempting to claim/imply that it was relevant that you and OP both (apparently) believe that "OP's post was/is general", and that that somehow meant there are no goalposts and/or that you have not moved the goalposts, simply due to you (and OP) making and agreeing with that claim. You have - laughably - still not provided the meaning that you were attempting to convey by "general" (or what meaning you believed the OP was attempting to convey causing you to - seemingly - agree with them).
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.